[
 {
  "id": "comp:moro-acusacao-2020-x-apoio-2022",
  "titulo": "Moro: accusation of interference in the Federal Police (PF) (2020) × support for Bolsonaro in the runoff (2022) × justification",
  "tipo": "mudanca_alianca",
  "disse": "fala:moro-demissao-pessoa-de-contato-pessoal",
  "depois": [
   {
    "data": "2022-10-04",
    "texto": "Two days after being elected senator for Paraná, Moro announced on Twitter his support for Bolsonaro in the runoff, arguing opposition to the PT; according to Poder360, the two reconciled by phone the day before.",
    "evid": "evid:f04-moro-apoio-bolsonaro-2022",
    "fala": "fala:moro-tuite-apoio-bolsonaro-2022-10-04"
   },
   {
    "data": "2022-10-04",
    "texto": "Bolsonaro said the disagreement had been overcome (Folha de Pernambuco, 10/4); the next day, according to Correio Braziliense (10/5), he said that \"the past is the past.\"",
    "evid": "evid:f04-bolsonaro-superado-2022",
    "fala": "fala:bolsonaro-2022-10-04-superado"
   },
   {
    "data": "2023-05-23",
    "texto": "Asked whether he is a Bolsonaro supporter, Moro said no and that his support for Bolsonaro was in the runoff, when there were no alternatives.",
    "evid": "evid:f04-moro-nao-bolsonarista-2023",
    "fala": "fala:moro-2023-apoiei-segundo-turno"
   },
   {
    "data": "2026-03-24",
    "texto": "Moro joined the PL, Bolsonaro's party, alongside Flávio Bolsonaro, a presidential pre-candidate.",
    "evid": "evid:f04-moro-pl-2026",
    "fala": "fala:moro-2026-03-24-parana-flavio"
   },
   {
    "data": "2026-04-06",
    "texto": "According to Revista Fórum (sole source, an outlet with a critical editorial line), at a press conference Moro did not directly answer whether he saw a risk of Flávio Bolsonaro controlling the Federal Police (PF); Fórum links the question to the accusation Moro made against Jair Bolsonaro in 2020 (obtaining intelligence information and reports and replacing the PF leadership).",
    "evid": "evid:f04-moro-coletiva-2026-04-06"
   },
   {
    "data": "2026-10-22",
    "texto": "Moro, governor-elect of Paraná, asked for votes for Flávio Bolsonaro in the runoff.",
    "evid": "evid:f04-moro-apoio-flavio-2026-10-22",
    "fala": "fala:moro-2026-10-22-apoio-flavio-segundo-turno"
   }
  ],
  "explicacao": "fala:moro-2023-nao-bolsonarista",
  "explicacoes": [],
  "nota_explicacao": "The 2022 justification is in the tweet itself (against the \"PT's power project\") and, in 2023, in the GloboNews interview (\"we had no alternatives\"). In the sources read, Moro neither withdrew nor repeated the 2020 accusation when justifying his support; searches did not locate any retraction, and the evasive answer of April 2026 is an account from a single outlet. Do not presume a retraction or a reaffirmation.",
  "estado": "revisado_humano",
  "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf"
 },
 {
  "id": "comp:moro-lealdade-2019-x-demissao-2020-x-apoio-2022",
  "titulo": "Moro: 'would never run against' Bolsonaro (2019) × resignation (2020) × presidential pre-candidacy (2021–22) × runoff support (2022)",
  "tipo": "mudanca_posicao",
  "disse": "fala:moro-2019-lealdade-reeleicao",
  "depois": [
   {
    "data": "2020-04-24",
    "texto": "Six months later, Moro resigned and accused Bolsonaro of insisting on replacing the Federal Police (PF) leadership in order to obtain information.",
    "evid": "evid:f04-moro-pronunciamento-24abr",
    "fala": "fala:moro-demissao-nao-ha-como-persistir"
   },
   {
    "data": "2021-11-10",
    "texto": "Moro joined Podemos and presented himself as a pre-candidate for President of the Republic in 2022, a race in which Bolsonaro was the incumbent president.",
    "evid": "evid:f04-moro-podemos-2021"
   },
   {
    "data": "2022-03-31",
    "texto": "Moro announced that he was giving up, at that moment, the presidential pre-candidacy and was joining União Brasil.",
    "evid": "evid:f04-moro-uniao-2022"
   },
   {
    "data": "2022-10-04",
    "texto": "Moro declared a vote for Bolsonaro in the 2022 runoff.",
    "evid": "evid:f04-moro-apoio-bolsonaro-2022",
    "fala": "fala:moro-tuite-apoio-bolsonaro-2022-10-04"
   }
  ],
  "explicacoes": [],
  "nota_explicacao": "The phrase was said in an interview recorded on October 16, 2019 (published on 10/21) and is conditional: Moro would never run against Bolsonaro \"if he is really a candidate for reelection,\" as a member of the government. In 2020 he broke with him; in 2021–22 he was a presidential pre-candidate (joined Podemos on November 10, 2021; withdrew the pre-candidacy on March 31, 2022); in 2022 he voted for Bolsonaro against Lula. We did not find a statement by Moro explicitly connecting these positions; the condition that Bolsonaro be a candidate and that Moro be in the government must be read together with it.",
  "estado": "revisado_humano",
  "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf"
 },
 {
  "id": "comp:bolsonaro-seguranca-rio-reuniao-x-depoimento",
  "titulo": "Bolsonaro: 'our security people in Rio' (meeting of April 22, 2020) × explanation to the Federal Police (PF) (2021)",
  "tipo": "declaracao_x_documento",
  "disse": "fala:bolsonaro-reuniao-seguranca-rio-familia",
  "depois": [
   {
    "data": "2021-11-03",
    "texto": "To the Federal Police (PF), according to the news report, Bolsonaro said he was referring to a unit of the GSI responsible for his and his family's security, not to the Rio PF.",
    "evid": "evid:f04-bolsonaro-interpretacao-gsi",
    "fala": "fala:bolsonaro-depoimento-pf-2021-seguranca-pessoal"
   },
   {
    "data": "2022-03",
    "texto": "In its first report, the Federal Police (PF) concluded that it found no proof of interference; the report was not read here (secondary source).",
    "evid": "evid:f04-pf-relatorio-2022"
   },
   {
    "data": "2025-10-16",
    "texto": "The Supreme Federal Court (STF) reopened the inquiry, at the request of the Office of the Prosecutor General (PGR), for further investigative steps; the PGR considered it essential to verify whether there had been \"interference or attempts at interference in the investigations, using the structure of the State.\"",
    "evid": "evid:f04-reabertura-inq4831-2025"
   }
  ],
  "explicacao": "fala:bolsonaro-depoimento-pf-2021-seguranca-pessoal",
  "explicacoes": [],
  "nota_explicacao": "The excerpt from the meeting does not mention the Federal Police (PF), the Rio superintendency, or Moro's name. Moro stated in testimony that, at the meeting, Bolsonaro demanded the replacement of the Rio superintendency and of the director-general; Bolsonaro told the PF he was talking about his personal security. The comparison records both readings without deciding between them; the decision lies with the Supreme Federal Court (STF). Status as of October 24, 2026: inquiry reopened on October 16, 2025; the latest news found on its progress is from April 12, 2026.",
  "estado": "revisado_humano",
  "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf"
 },
 {
  "id": "comp:bolsonaro-valeixo-a-pedido-x-mensagem-e-dou",
  "titulo": "Bolsonaro: Valeixo \"agreed\" to the dismissal at his own request × message of 4/22 and Official Gazette",
  "tipo": "declaracao_x_documento",
  "disse": "fala:bolsonaro-resposta-valeixo-a-pedido",
  "depois": [
   {
    "data": "2020-04-22",
    "texto": "Bolsonaro's message to Moro: Valeixo's departure was \"decided\" for that week, and Moro could say \"just the form. At his request or ex officio.\"",
    "evid": "evid:f04-valeixo-mensagem-22abr",
    "fala": "fala:bolsonaro-mensagem-valeixo-sai-forma"
   },
   {
    "data": "2020-04-24",
    "texto": "The act was published in the Official Gazette (DOU) as \"at his request\" and republished in a special edition without that justification.",
    "evid": "evid:f04-dou-24abr-a-pedido"
   },
   {
    "data": "2020-05-25",
    "texto": "The Presidency's General Secretariat admitted to the Federal Police (PF) that Moro's name was included in the act without his knowledge, claiming it was customary practice.",
    "evid": "evid:f04-governo-admite-assinatura-moro"
   }
  ],
  "explicacoes": [],
  "nota_explicacao": "In the sources read, we did not find testimony or a public statement by Maurício Valeixo himself on whether or not he agreed to leave at his own request. In his address, Bolsonaro cites an account that Valeixo told superintendents he had wanted to leave since January (source: Poder360 transcript), and Moro says he only agreed to leave under pressure (statement of April 24, 2020).",
  "estado": "revisado_humano",
  "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf"
 },
 {
  "id": "comp:bolsonaro-condicao-stf-x-mensagens-zambelli",
  "titulo": "Bolsonaro: Moro made the swap conditional on a Supreme Federal Court seat × Zambelli's messages and Moro's denial",
  "tipo": "declaracao_x_documento",
  "disse": "fala:bolsonaro-resposta-moro-supremo",
  "depois": [
   {
    "data": "2020-04-24",
    "texto": "Moro denied having set the condition (statement of April 24, 2020) and showed Jornal Nacional messages from Congresswoman Carla Zambelli that suggested a swap in exchange for a nomination to the Supreme Federal Court (STF); he replied that he was not for sale.",
    "evid": "evid:f04-jn-mensagens-zambelli",
    "fala": "fala:zambelli-mensagem-stf-promessa"
   },
   {
    "data": "2021-11-03",
    "texto": "In testimony to the Federal Police (PF), Bolsonaro maintained his version that Moro would agree to Ramagem's appointment after being nominated to the Supreme Federal Court (STF).",
    "evid": "evid:f04-bolsonaro-depoimento-2021-stf-condicao",
    "fala": "fala:bolsonaro-depoimento-pf-2021-moro-stf"
   }
  ],
  "explicacoes": [],
  "nota_explicacao": "Zambelli's messages do not involve the president. They show an allied congresswoman offering help with a nomination to the Supreme Federal Court (STF), which Moro rejected; they neither prove nor refute the conversation reported by Bolsonaro. Zambelli declined to comment to Globo.",
  "estado": "revisado_humano",
  "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf"
 },
 {
  "id": "comp:moro-jamais-politica-ministerio",
  "titulo": "Moro: \"never\" in politics (2016) × Bolsonaro's minister (2018)",
  "tipo": "mudanca_posicao",
  "disse": "fala:moro-estadao-2016-11-jamais-politica",
  "depois": [
   {
    "data": "2018-11-01",
    "texto": "Moro released a statement accepting President-elect Jair Bolsonaro's invitation to be Minister of Justice and Public Security.",
    "evid": "evid:f06-moro-aceita-ministerio-2018-11-01",
    "fala": "fala:moro-nota-2018-11-01-aceite-ministerio"
   },
   {
    "data": "2018-11-06",
    "texto": "At the first press conference, he said he had not contradicted the statement and that he had no intention of running for elected office.",
    "fala": "fala:moro-coletiva-2018-11-06-nao-contrariei"
   }
  ],
  "explicacao": "fala:moro-coletiva-2018-11-06-nao-contrariei",
  "explicacoes": [
   "fala:moro-decisao-coletiva-2018-11-06",
   "fala:moro-bial-2021-11-17-explica-2016",
   "fala:moro-bial-2021-11-17-nao-faltei"
  ],
  "analise": "The 2016 question was whether Moro would run for office or enter politics; he answered \"never.\" In 2018 he accepted a cabinet ministry, a post appointed by a president-elect from the camp opposed to that of the defendant he had convicted. There are no two literal statements that negate each other: Moro maintained that the ministry was a \"technical function.\" Classified as a change of position, with his explanation in 2018 and, later, in 2021.",
  "estado": "revisado_humano",
  "lote": "f06-falas"
 },
 {
  "id": "comp:moro-sem-pretensao-cargo-eletivo-podemos",
  "titulo": "Moro: \"no intention\" of seeking elected office (2017–2018) × presidential pre-candidacy (2021)",
  "tipo": "mudanca_posicao",
  "disse": "fala:moro-coletiva-2018-11-06-nao-contrariei",
  "depois": [
   {
    "data": "2021-11-10",
    "texto": "Moro joined Podemos and presented himself as a pre-candidate for President of the Republic.",
    "evid": "evid:f06-moro-filiacao-podemos-2021-11-10"
   },
   {
    "data": "2021-11-17",
    "texto": "He said he was \"ready to lead\" the project and, in the same interview, that he had never had the ambition for political office.",
    "fala": "fala:moro-bial-2021-11-17-pronto-liderar"
   }
  ],
  "explicacao": "fala:moro-bial-2021-11-17-nao-faltei",
  "explicacoes": [
   "fala:moro-bial-2021-11-17-explica-2016",
   "fala:moro-bial-2021-11-17-explica-2018"
  ],
  "analise": "Before 2018, Moro stated in several interviews that he had no political intentions (see fala:moro-bbc-2017-sem-pretensao, fala:moro-la-tercera-2017-09-carreira-politica, fala:moro-globonews-2017-10-vocacao). In 2018 he repeated that he had no intention of running for elected office; in 2021 he joined a party and said he was ready to lead a presidential project. Moro stated that he had not been untruthful and that the context had changed. Classified as a change of position, not a literal contradiction: the 2021 phrase about \"ambition for political office\" coexists with the willingness to lead.",
  "estado": "revisado_humano",
  "lote": "f06-falas"
 },
 {
  "id": "comp:moro-ambicoes-2020-pre-candidatura-2021",
  "titulo": "Moro: \"I never had those ambitions\" (June 2020) × pre-candidacy (November 2021)",
  "tipo": "mudanca_posicao",
  "disse": "fala:moro-folha-2020-06-ambicoes",
  "depois": [
   {
    "data": "2021-11-10",
    "texto": "He joined Podemos and presented himself as a presidential pre-candidate.",
    "evid": "evid:f06-moro-filiacao-podemos-2021-11-10"
   },
   {
    "data": "2021-11-17",
    "texto": "He said he was \"ready to lead this project.\"",
    "fala": "fala:moro-bial-2021-11-17-pronto-liderar"
   }
  ],
  "explicacao": "fala:moro-bial-2021-11-17-nao-faltei",
  "explicacoes": [
   "fala:moro-bial-2021-11-17-explica-2018"
  ],
  "analise": "The 2020 statement was read in a Gazeta/Folhapress reproduction, without the full question; the excerpt \"personal ambitions at that level\" may have a narrower scope than that of the pre-candidacy. The explanation for the change is the same as in 2021 (context). Conservative classification.",
  "estado": "revisado_humano",
  "lote": "f06-falas"
 },
 {
  "id": "comp:moro-vou-ate-o-fim-desistencia-2022",
  "titulo": "Moro: \"I'm going all the way\" (March 10, 2022) × \"I give up, at this moment\" (March 31, 2022)",
  "tipo": "mudanca_posicao",
  "disse": "fala:moro-cnn-2022-03-10-vou-ate-o-fim",
  "depois": [
   {
    "data": "2022-03-31",
    "texto": "Moro left Podemos, joined União Brasil, and said he was giving up, at that moment, the presidential pre-candidacy.",
    "evid": "evid:f06-moro-saida-podemos-uniao-2022-03-31",
    "fala": "fala:moro-instagram-2022-03-31-abro-mao"
   },
   {
    "data": "2022-04-01",
    "texto": "The next day he said he had not given up on anything, much less on the dream of changing Brazil.",
    "fala": "fala:moro-pronunciamento-2022-04-01-nao-desisti"
   }
  ],
  "explicacao": "fala:moro-instagram-2022-03-31-alternativa",
  "explicacoes": [
   "fala:moro-pronunciamento-2022-04-01-nao-desisti",
   "fala:moro-cnn-2022-04-capital-politico"
  ],
  "analise": "The statements are opposed on the surface (\"Giving up my candidacy would be giving up on changing Brazil\" × \"I give up […] the presidential pre-candidacy\"), but Moro qualified the second with \"at this moment\" and denied having given up on the project. For that reason it is not a literal contradiction. In April he said that \"only with political capital\" the candidacy would not have worked.",
  "estado": "revisado_humano",
  "lote": "f06-falas"
 },
 {
  "id": "comp:moro-bolsonaro-2020-2022-alianca",
  "titulo": "Moro and Bolsonaro: accusations of April 2020 × support in the 2022 runoff",
  "tipo": "mudanca_alianca",
  "disse": "fala:moro-demissao-pessoa-de-contato-pessoal",
  "depois": [
   {
    "data": "2022-10-04",
    "texto": "Moro declared on Twitter his support for Bolsonaro in the runoff, \"against the PT's power project.\"",
    "evid": "evid:f06-moro-apoio-bolsonaro-2022-10-04",
    "fala": "fala:moro-tuite-apoio-bolsonaro-2022-10-04"
   },
   {
    "data": "2022-10-05",
    "texto": "Bolsonaro said the differences had been overcome.",
    "evid": "evid:f06-bolsonaro-moro-reaproximacao-2022-10"
   }
  ],
  "explicacoes": [],
  "nota_explicacao": "In the sources consulted, as of October 24, 2026, we did not find a public explanation from Moro reconciling the 2022 support with the accusations of April 24, 2020 (the research did not include interviews after October 2022). The announcement itself justifies the support by opposition to Lula and the PT.",
  "analise": "This comparison overlaps with comp:moro-acusacao-2020-x-apoio-2022 (same statement and same 2022 support); kept because it has its own items. The 2020 accusation is Moro's and was denied by Bolsonaro; the comparison records only the change of alliance between the two, not the truth of the accusation.",
  "estado": "revisado_humano",
  "lote": "f06-falas"
 },
 {
  "id": "comp:bolsonaro-moro-2020-2022-alianca",
  "titulo": "Bolsonaro on Moro: \"commitment to himself, to his ego\" (2020) × \"the past is the past\" (2022)",
  "tipo": "mudanca_alianca",
  "disse": "fala:bolsonaro-2020-04-24-ego",
  "depois": [
   {
    "data": "2021-11-11",
    "texto": "Of Moro's speech on joining Podemos, he said that Moro \"learned nothing.\"",
    "fala": "fala:bolsonaro-2021-11-11-nao-aprendeu"
   },
   {
    "data": "2022-10-04",
    "texto": "After Moro's support in the runoff, he said the differences had been overcome.",
    "fala": "fala:bolsonaro-2022-10-04-superado"
   }
  ],
  "explicacao": "fala:bolsonaro-2022-passado-e-passado",
  "explicacoes": [],
  "analise": "Bolsonaro justified the forgiveness by citing the Lord's Prayer and attributed the break to Moro's lack of \"political experience.\"",
  "estado": "revisado_humano",
  "lote": "f06-falas"
 },
 {
  "id": "comp:moro-vaza-jato-nota-x-stf",
  "titulo": "Moro: \"no abnormality is perceived\" (June 9, 2019) × Supreme Federal Court (STF) rulings on his bias (2021)",
  "tipo": "declaracao_x_documento",
  "disse": "fala:moro-nota-2019-06-09-vaza-jato",
  "depois": [
   {
    "data": "2021-03-09",
    "texto": "Gilmar Mendes's vote concluded that the duty of impartiality had been violated and cited Operation Spoofing dialogues solely for the historical record.",
    "evid": "evid:f06-gilmar-voto-fundamentos-2021",
    "fala": "fala:gilmar-voto-2021-03-09-conclusao"
   },
   {
    "data": "2021-03-23",
    "texto": "The Second Panel of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) declared Moro biased in the triplex case (3 to 2, according to Poder360).",
    "evid": "evid:f06-stf-segunda-turma-suspeicao-2021-03-23"
   },
   {
    "data": "2021-03-23",
    "texto": "Cármen Lúcia, who in 2018 had voted against the bias ruling, changed her vote, saying the judgment was open to new elements and that she was voting on the basis of the data of that moment.",
    "evid": "evid:f06-carmen-lucia-voto-2018-contra-suspeicao",
    "fala": "fala:carmen-2021-03-23-novos-elementos"
   },
   {
    "data": "2021-03-23",
    "texto": "Nunes Marques voted against the bias ruling and considered the use of the dialogues as evidence unlawful.",
    "fala": "fala:nunes-marques-2021-03-23-prova-ilicita"
   },
   {
    "data": "2021-06-23",
    "texto": "The full court (Plenary) upheld the Second Panel's decision; Fux and Marco Aurélio dissented.",
    "evid": "evid:f06-stf-plenario-mantem-suspeicao-2021-06-23",
    "fala": "fala:fux-plenario-2021-prova-ilicita"
   }
  ],
  "explicacoes": [],
  "nota_explicacao": "In the sources consulted, as of October 24, 2026, we did not find a statement or declaration by Moro on the decisions of March 23, 2021 and June 23, 2021 (the research was interrupted by the environment's search limit; pending item).",
  "analise": "In 2019 Moro said that the content of the messages, \"taken out of context,\" showed no abnormality. In 2021 the Supreme Federal Court (STF) recognized the bias on the basis of acts performed in the case file and, in Gilmar's vote, also on the basis of Spoofing dialogues. The majority is not uniform as to the grounds; dissenting justices pointed to the unlawfulness of the evidence. The comparison places the statement and the ruling side by side, without concluding on the merits: these are judicial decisions subject to criticism, including by the justices in the minority.",
  "estado": "revisado_humano",
  "lote": "f06-falas"
 },
 {
  "id": "comp:moro-dallagnol-economia-estudos",
  "titulo": "Lava Jato and the economic crisis: \"Lava Jato is not to blame\" (2016) × study estimates (2021–2024)",
  "tipo": "declaracao_x_documento",
  "disse": "fala:moro-lide-2016-03-09-culpa-nao-e-da-lava-jato",
  "depois": [
   {
    "data": "2017-04",
    "texto": "Economist Eduardo Giannetti stated that Lava Jato worsened, but did not cause, the crisis.",
    "evid": "evid:f06-giannetti-nao-causou-crise-2017"
   },
   {
    "data": "2019-12-16",
    "texto": "Dallagnol responded to Toffoli by saying that blaming the investigations for companies going under is closing one's eyes to incompetence, mismanagement, and corruption.",
    "fala": "fala:dallagnol-twitter-2019-12-16-irresponsabilidade"
   },
   {
    "data": "2021-04-22",
    "texto": "Lewandowski cited a study that would attribute to the operation a loss of R$142.6 billion of GDP and the dismantling of sectors (authorship differs among the sources). The same figure appears as a 2015 projection by a consulting firm (GO Associados, ex ante scenario), not as an observed loss of GDP.",
    "evid": "evid:f06-lewandowski-estudo-142-bilhoes-2021-04-22"
   },
   {
    "data": "2024-03-17",
    "texto": "Agência Brasil reported on studies by DIEESE and UFRJ/Uerj. DIEESE estimates 4.44 million potential jobs added up over 2014–2017, not people laid off; the UFRJ/Uerj study cites losses of up to R$142 billion in sectors, a figure from 2015 consulting firms.",
    "evid": "evid:f06-estudos-empregos-pib-2024"
   }
  ],
  "explicacoes": [],
  "nota_explicacao": "Moro and Dallagnol have not publicly changed their position; as of October 24, 2026, we did not find a statement from either responding to the 2021–2024 estimates.",
  "analise": "Moro's statement addresses the cause of the recession; the studies estimate the operation's impact on jobs, investment, and sectors, without necessarily asserting that it caused the national crisis. There is also disagreement among economists about the share attributable to the operation, to economic policy, and to the corruption under investigation. This is not a contradiction between the two positions: they are different questions, with methodologies to be examined in another entry in the archive.",
  "estado": "revisado_humano",
  "lote": "f06-falas"
 },
 {
  "id": "comp:dallagnol-convicao-powerpoint-documentos",
  "titulo": "Dallagnol: \"evidence consists of pieces of reality\" (September 14, 2016) × message \"I find it lame,\" Superior Court of Justice (STJ) ruling, and dismissal at the National Council of the Public Prosecutor's Office (CNMP)",
  "tipo": "declaracao_x_documento",
  "disse": "fala:dallagnol-coletiva-2016-09-14-provas-pedacos",
  "depois": [
   {
    "data": "2016",
    "texto": "Message released by Operation Spoofing, according to a ConJur report reproduced by CUT/RBA (date and recipient not stated on the page read; authenticity not confirmed in the sources), attributed to Dallagnol, who allegedly wrote \"we are not proving the various crimes\" and found the indictment \"lame.\"",
    "evid": "evid:f06-dallagnol-mensagem-capenga-2016",
    "fala": "fala:dallagnol-mensagem-2016-09-capenga"
   },
   {
    "data": "2022-03-22",
    "texto": "The Fourth Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) ruled, 4 to 1, that Dallagnol must compensate Lula for excess in publicizing the indictment (source not reopened in audit B).",
    "evid": "evid:f06-stj-condena-dallagnol-powerpoint-2022-03-22"
   },
   {
    "data": "2021",
    "texto": "The National Council of the Public Prosecutor's Office (CNMP) dismissed, on statute-of-limitations grounds, Lula's complaint against Dallagnol over the PowerPoint, according to Poder360 (exact date of the dismissal not stated).",
    "evid": "evid:f06-cnmp-arquivou-powerpoint-prescricao"
   },
   {
    "data": "2016-09-15",
    "texto": "A fact-check records that the viral phrase \"we have no proof, but we have conviction\" was not literally said at the press conference.",
    "evid": "evid:f06-checagem-frase-nao-temos-prova-nao-dita"
   }
  ],
  "explicacoes": [],
  "nota_explicacao": "In the sources consulted, as of October 24, 2026, we did not find a public explanation from Dallagnol about the \"lame\" message, nor his position on the authenticity of that specific message.",
  "analise": "The public statement describes the relationship between evidence and conviction; the message, if authentic, shows internal doubt about part of the thesis. The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) ruling addresses the manner of publicizing the indictment (excess), not the merits of the criminal accusation. None of the sources read attributes to Dallagnol the phrase \"we have no proof, but we have conviction.\"",
  "estado": "revisado_humano",
  "lote": "f06-falas"
 }
]