[ { "id": "ep:f03-projetos-paralisados-rnest-comperj-premium", "titulo": "Refining projects halted, postponed, or canceled: RNEST-2, Comperj, and Premium I and II", "nucleo": "petrobras", "pessoas": [], "resumo": "Petrobras postponed the second unit of RNEST and Comperj in December 2014 and canceled the Premium I and II refineries in January 2015. It attributed the postponement to measures to preserve cash and to difficulties the investigation created for suppliers, and the accounting losses to planning deficiencies, a higher discount rate, delayed cash inflows, and lower growth. The Premium refineries were canceled because the assumptions of the 2014–2018 plan were not met. In 2023 and 2025, reports record resumptions (GasLub; RNEST Train 2), with no primary announcement located.", "acusacao": [], "evidencias": [ "evid:f03-rnest-trem1-2014", "evid:f03-rnest-comperj-adiados-2014", "evid:f03-rnest-comperj-causas-impairment", "evid:f03-rnest-comperj-impairment-por-projeto", "evid:f03-comperj-cancelamentos-2016", "evid:f03-premium-cancelamento-2015", "evid:f03-premium-baixa-reais", "evid:f03-gaslub-2023", "evid:f03-rnest-trem2-2025", "evid:f03-20f2014-postergar-projetos" ], "respostas": [], "decisoes": [], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "According to the sources consulted, RNEST Train 2 and the former Comperj were resumed after 2023; Premium I and II remain canceled. The current status of the works in October 2026 was not located.", "evid": [ "evid:f03-gaslub-2023", "evid:f03-rnest-trem2-2025" ] }, "falas": [], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f03-petrobras" }, { "id": "ep:f03-fornecedores-bloqueio-cautelar", "titulo": "Precautionary blocking of Petrobras suppliers (December 2014) and its stated effects", "nucleo": "petrobras", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:paulo-roberto-costa", "pessoa:alberto-youssef" ], "resumo": "On December 29, 2014 Petrobras temporarily blocked companies from 23 groups named in testimony as participants in a cartel. The company stated that contractors and suppliers had difficulty obtaining credit and faced bankruptcy risk, that the lack of qualified suppliers contributed to the postponement of projects, and that limitations among Brazilian suppliers delayed production units. In 2016 there were still 31 companies suspended and, in 2018, Odebrecht signed a commitment agreement (according to a report).", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:paulo-roberto-costa", "texto": "Paulo Roberto Costa's testimony on October 8, 2014 at the 13th Federal Court of Curitiba, cited by Petrobras, named business groups as participants in a cartel (accusation, not a decision).", "evid": [ "evid:f03-bloqueio-2014-12-29" ] }, { "autor": "pessoa:alberto-youssef", "texto": "Alberto Youssef's testimony on October 8, 2014 at the 13th Federal Court of Curitiba, cited by Petrobras, named business groups as participants in a cartel (accusation, not a decision).", "evid": [ "evid:f03-bloqueio-2014-12-29" ] }, { "autor": null, "texto": "Cooperating witnesses from Toyo Setal and Setal (date not stated), according to Petrobras, also named business groups as participants in a cartel (accusation, not a decision).", "evid": [ "evid:f03-bloqueio-2014-12-29" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f03-bloqueio-2014-12-29", "evid:f03-bloqueio-contagens", "evid:f03-fornecedores-liquidez", "evid:f03-fornecedores-conteudo-local", "evid:f03-grau-risco-integridade", "evid:f03-producao-fornecedores-brasileiros", "evid:f03-retomada-odebrecht-2018" ], "respostas": [], "decisoes": [], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "Current list of companies still blocked and primary announcements of their release not located in the sources consulted.", "evid": [ "evid:f03-retomada-odebrecht-2018" ] }, "falas": [], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f03-petrobras" }, { "id": "ep:convite-bolsonaro-moro-2018", "titulo": "Bolsonaro's invitation to Moro and the promises of autonomy (2018)", "nucleo": "moro-bolsonaro-pf", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro" ], "resumo": "On November 1, 2018, after a 1 hour 42 minute meeting in Rio, Moro accepted becoming Minister of Justice and Public Security, with an anticorruption and anti-organized-crime agenda. In 2020, Moro said he had been promised 'carte blanche' to appoint aides, including at the Federal Police (PF); Bolsonaro said he had agreed to 'autonomy,' with veto power over key posts. In August 2019, asked whether Moro had carte blanche, Bolsonaro said the veto power is his. In the sources read there is no public record of the 2018 conversation, nor a 2018 statement by Bolsonaro with 'carte blanche.'", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "Moro stated on April 24, 2020 that the president promised carte blanche to appoint aides, and that replacing the director-general without cause would violate the promise.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-moro-afirma-carta-branca-prometida" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f04-convite-aceite-2018-11-01", "evid:f04-bolsonaro-tuite-2018-11-01", "evid:f04-poder360-carta-branca-expressao-2018", "evid:f04-bolsonaro-carta-branca-poder-veto-2019", "evid:f04-lei-13964-anticrime" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "texto": "He said he had agreed to autonomy with veto power over key posts and that he gave up choosing the director-general because he trusted Moro.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-bolsonaro-versao-autonomia-veto" ], "fala": "fala:bolsonaro-2020-04-24-autonomia" } ], "decisoes": [], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "Divergence of versions with no document to resolve it. Inauguration in early January 2019 (1/1 or 1/2; not confirmed, as the primary gov.br source is inaccessible) and Law 13.964/2019 (December 24, 2019) recorded as context.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-bolsonaro-carta-branca-poder-veto-2019" ] }, "falas": [ "fala:moro-nota-2018-11-01-aceite-ministerio", "fala:bolsonaro-tuite-moro-aceitou-2018-11-01", "fala:moro-demissao-carta-branca-prometida", "fala:bolsonaro-2020-04-24-autonomia", "fala:bolsonaro-2019-08-24-carta-branca-veto", "fala:moro-2019-lealdade-reeleicao" ], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf" }, { "id": "ep:superintendencia-pf-rio-2019", "titulo": "Replacement of the PF superintendent in Rio de Janeiro (August 2019)", "nucleo": "moro-bolsonaro-pf", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:ricardo-saadi", "pessoa:mauricio-valeixo" ], "resumo": "On August 15 and 16, 2019, Bolsonaro announced that he would replace the PF command in Rio and said the name would be that of the Amazonas superintendent; the PF replied that the change had already been planned. Ricardo Saadi's dismissal came on August 30, 2019. Moro, in 2020, said the superintendent wanted to leave for personal reasons and that the change was agreed between him and Valeixo as a 'technical replacement.' Bolsonaro, in 2021, told the PF that he suggested the change because Rio is 'very complicated.' Moro's defense pointed out, in a June 2020 petition, that Bolsonaro's request coincided in that month with a request by Queiroz's defense for access to a confidential PF-RJ inquiry.", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "Moro said on April 24, 2020 that Bolsonaro wanted to replace the Rio superintendent without reason and, later, the one in Pernambuco as well; in his defense, it was argued that the first wish for a replacement coincided with the request by Queiroz's defense.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-defesa-moro-queiroz-saadi", "evid:f04-moro-pronunciamento-24abr" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f04-saadi-troca-2019-08", "evid:f04-saadi-depoimento-valeixo-ligou", "evid:f04-bolsonaro-depoimento-rio-complicado", "evid:f04-defesa-moro-queiroz-saadi", "evid:f04-moro-depoimento-conteudo" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "texto": "To the PF, on November 3, 2021, he said he suggested the change because Rio is 'very complicated' and the head needed more freedom; he denied any intent to obtain privileged information.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-bolsonaro-depoimento-rio-complicado" ], "fala": "fala:bolsonaro-depoimento-pf-2021-rio-complicado" } ], "decisoes": [], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-04-12", "texto": "The episode is part of Inquiry 4831, reopened on October 16, 2025 and open according to the latest news located (April 12, 2026); no statement from the PGR or later decision located (see proc:inq-4831). The PF concluded in 2022 that there was no interference and, according to Gazeta do Povo (April 12, 2026, single source), again in 2026, in a report that analyzed Inq 4781 and 4828; the PGR requested complementary measures in 2025.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-reabertura-inq4831-2025", "evid:f04-pf-relatorio-2022", "evid:f04-pf-relatorio-2026" ] }, "falas": [ "fala:bolsonaro-2019-08-16-quem-manda-sou-eu", "fala:bolsonaro-depoimento-pf-2021-rio-complicado" ], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf" }, { "id": "ep:exoneracao-valeixo-e-ramagem-2020", "titulo": "Dismissal of Maurício Valeixo and suspended appointment of Alexandre Ramagem (April 2020)", "nucleo": "moro-bolsonaro-pf", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:mauricio-valeixo", "pessoa:alexandre-ramagem", "pessoa:alexandre-de-moraes" ], "resumo": "On April 22, 2020 Bolsonaro wrote to Moro that Valeixo's departure was decided. On 4/24 the dismissal act appeared in the Official Gazette 'at his request,' with Moro's name, who said he had not signed it; the Presidency's General Secretariat later admitted having included Moro's name without his knowledge, as customary practice, and the act was republished without Moro's signature. Bolsonaro said Valeixo agreed to leave at his own request. The nomination of Alexandre Ramagem (then head of Abin) for the Federal Police (PF) was suspended on April 29, 2020 by a preliminary injunction from Alexandre de Moraes in MS 37.097, on indications of misuse of authority.", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "Moro said he did not sign the decree, that there was no formal request from Valeixo, and that the 'at his request' act was not true; that Ramagem had close ties to the president's family.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-moro-nao-assinou-sidof", "evid:f04-moro-pronunciamento-24abr", "evid:f04-moro-depoimento-conteudo" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f04-valeixo-mensagem-22abr", "evid:f04-dou-24abr-a-pedido", "evid:f04-governo-admite-assinatura-moro", "evid:f04-moro-nao-assinou-sidof", "evid:f04-ramagem-liminar-moraes" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "texto": "Said the dismissal occurred after a conversation with Moro and that Valeixo agreed, by phone, to the dismissal at his own request; that it is his prerogative to appoint the director-general.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-bolsonaro-resposta-24abr" ], "fala": "fala:bolsonaro-resposta-valeixo-a-pedido" } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2020-04-29", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Rapporteur justice (preliminary injunction)", "processo": "MS 37.097", "tipo": "constitucional", "resultado": "Suspended the decree appointing Alexandre Ramagem as director-general of the Federal Police (PF), because misuse of authority was 'in theory' viable; preliminary injunction, no ruling on the merits.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-ramagem-liminar-moraes" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "According to Conjur (April 29, 2020), the president revoked the appointment on the same day as the injunction; a formal ruling that MS 37.097 was moot was not located. Ramagem is not the object of an accusation by Moro in the episode beyond the appointment.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-ramagem-liminar-moraes" ] }, "falas": [ "fala:bolsonaro-mensagem-valeixo-sai-forma", "fala:moro-mensagem-resposta-conversar-pessoalmente", "fala:moro-demissao-nao-assinei-decreto", "fala:moro-depoimento-pf-sidof", "fala:bolsonaro-resposta-valeixo-a-pedido", "fala:moraes-ramagem-desvio-de-finalidade", "fala:moro-depoimento-pf-ramagem-familia" ], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf" }, { "id": "ep:demissao-moro-24-abril-2020", "titulo": "Moro's resignation and Bolsonaro's response (April 24, 2020)", "nucleo": "moro-bolsonaro-pf", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro" ], "resumo": "Moro announced his departure from the ministry, accusing Bolsonaro of insisting on replacing the Federal Police (PF) leadership without cause and of wanting a person of personal acquaintance to obtain information and intelligence reports, and said the president mentioned inquiries at the Supreme Federal Court (STF). Hours later Bolsonaro responded in a 46-minute address: he denied interference, said Moro made Valeixo's replacement conditional on a nomination to the Supreme Federal Court (STF), and that he 'never' asked to interfere in investigations.", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "Bolsonaro attempted to interfere politically in the Federal Police (PF), wanting a person of personal acquaintance to obtain information and intelligence reports, and mentioned concern about inquiries at the Supreme Federal Court (STF).", "evid": [ "evid:f04-moro-pronunciamento-24abr" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f04-moro-pronunciamento-24abr", "evid:f04-bolsonaro-resposta-24abr", "evid:f04-moro-globo-entrevistas-verdadeiras" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "texto": "Denied wanting to know about ongoing investigations and said he had never asked for a relative to be shielded.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-bolsonaro-resposta-24abr" ], "fala": "fala:bolsonaro-resposta-nao-pediu-informacoes" }, { "autor": "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "texto": "Said that Moro made Valeixo's replacement conditional on a nomination to the Supreme Federal Court (STF).", "evid": [ "evid:f04-bolsonaro-resposta-24abr" ], "fala": "fala:bolsonaro-resposta-moro-supremo" } ], "decisoes": [], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-04-12", "texto": "Accusation under investigation in Inquiry 4831 (see proc:inq-4831), open according to the latest news located (April 12, 2026). No indictment or conviction for these facts in the sources read.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-reabertura-inq4831-2025", "evid:f04-pf-relatorio-2026" ] }, "falas": [ "fala:moro-demissao-carta-branca-prometida", "fala:moro-demissao-pessoa-de-contato-pessoal", "fala:moro-demissao-interferencia-politica-ele-disse", "fala:moro-demissao-inqueritos-no-stf", "fala:moro-demissao-nao-assinei-decreto", "fala:moro-demissao-sem-condicao-stf", "fala:moro-demissao-nao-ha-como-persistir", "fala:bolsonaro-2020-04-24-autonomia", "fala:bolsonaro-resposta-nao-pediu-informacoes", "fala:bolsonaro-resposta-nunca-pedi-blindar", "fala:bolsonaro-resposta-moro-supremo", "fala:bolsonaro-resposta-subordinado", "fala:moro-globo-entrevistas-eram-verdadeiras" ], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf" }, { "id": "ep:mensagens-moro-bolsonaro-zambelli-2020", "titulo": "Messages presented by Moro: Bolsonaro and Carla Zambelli (April 2020)", "nucleo": "moro-bolsonaro-pf", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "pessoa:carla-zambelli" ], "resumo": "To support his accusation and rebut Bolsonaro's version, Moro showed Jornal Nacional screenshots of conversations: Bolsonaro with 'one more reason for the swap' on receiving news about an inquiry into allied lawmakers; and Carla Zambelli asking him to accept Ramagem and suggesting Moro's move to the Supreme Federal Court (STF), with the reply 'I'm not for sale.' In May 2020, Estadão also released Bolsonaro's message of 4/22 about Valeixo's departure, taken from the phone handed to the Federal Police (PF).", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "The messages would support political interference (Bolsonaro) and would refute the condition of going to the Supreme Federal Court (STF) (Zambelli).", "evid": [ "evid:f04-jn-mensagem-bolsonaro-motivo-troca", "evid:f04-jn-mensagens-zambelli" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f04-jn-mensagem-bolsonaro-motivo-troca", "evid:f04-jn-mensagens-zambelli", "evid:f04-valeixo-mensagem-22abr" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "texto": "Denied wanting information about investigations; maintained, in 2021, the version about the Supreme Federal Court (STF).", "evid": [ "evid:f04-bolsonaro-resposta-24abr", "evid:f04-bolsonaro-depoimento-2021-stf-condicao" ] } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2020-04-29", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Rapporteur justice (preliminary injunction)", "processo": "MS 37.097", "tipo": "constitucional", "resultado": "The decision that suspended Ramagem's appointment cites Moro's public statements and the open inquiry; express mention of the released messages was not confirmed (text of the decision not opened).", "evid": [ "evid:f04-ramagem-liminar-moraes" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "Authenticity: the messages come from Moro's phone (copy handed to the Federal Police (PF)); we did not find a forensic examination or a formal challenge to authenticity in the sources read. Zambelli declined to comment to Globo.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-jn-mensagens-zambelli" ] }, "falas": [ "fala:bolsonaro-mensagem-valeixo-sai-forma", "fala:moro-mensagem-resposta-conversar-pessoalmente", "fala:bolsonaro-mensagem-mais-um-motivo-troca", "fala:moro-mensagem-inquerito-conduzido-por-moraes", "fala:zambelli-mensagem-aceite-ramagem", "fala:zambelli-mensagem-stf-promessa", "fala:moro-mensagem-nao-estou-a-venda" ], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf" }, { "id": "ep:reuniao-ministerial-22-abril-2020", "titulo": "Ministerial meeting of April 22, 2020", "nucleo": "moro-bolsonaro-pf", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:celso-de-mello" ], "resumo": "At the recorded meeting, Bolsonaro said he had already tried to replace 'people from our security in Rio de Janeiro,' said he would not wait to 'screw' his family and friends over because he could not replace someone in security 'at the end of the line,' and ordered that the ranks be 'replaced' up to the minister. Moro stated in testimony that, at that meeting, the president demanded the replacement of the Rio superintendent's office and of the director-general; Bolsonaro told the PF, in 2021, that he was speaking of the GSI unit that handles security for him and his family. The video and the transcript were released by Celso de Mello on May 22, 2020.", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "Moro said in testimony that Bolsonaro demanded, at the April 22, 2020 meeting, the replacement of the Rio superintendent's office and of the PF director-general.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-moro-depoimento-conteudo", "evid:f04-reuniao-trecho-seguranca-rio" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f04-reuniao-video-liberado", "evid:f04-reuniao-trecho-seguranca-rio", "evid:f04-bolsonaro-interpretacao-gsi" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "texto": "He told the PF (November 3, 2021) that he was speaking of personal and family security, not of the PF.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-bolsonaro-interpretacao-gsi" ], "fala": "fala:bolsonaro-depoimento-pf-2021-seguranca-pessoal" } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2020-05-22", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice rapporteur", "processo": "Inq 4831", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "Decision reported on May 22, 2020. He released the video and the transcript of the meeting, except for excerpts about two countries with diplomatic relations.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-reuniao-video-liberado" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-04-12", "texto": "The interpretation of the excerpt remains in dispute in Inquiry 4831, open according to the latest news located (April 12, 2026). The PF said in 2022 and, according to Gazeta do Povo (April 12, 2026), in 2026 that it had found no interference.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-pf-relatorio-2022", "evid:f04-pf-relatorio-2026" ] }, "falas": [ "fala:bolsonaro-reuniao-seguranca-rio-familia", "fala:bolsonaro-reuniao-informacoes-sistema-particular", "fala:bolsonaro-depoimento-pf-2021-seguranca-pessoal" ], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf" }, { "id": "ep:flavio-bolsonaro-queiroz-pf-rio", "titulo": "Flávio Bolsonaro, Queiroz, and the Rio Federal Police: what Moro alleged and what he did not", "nucleo": "moro-bolsonaro-pf", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "pessoa:flavio-bolsonaro", "pessoa:fabricio-queiroz", "pessoa:paulo-marinho" ], "resumo": "In the address of April 24, 2020 and in the testimony of May 2, 2020, Moro did not mention Flávio Bolsonaro or the 'rachadinha'; in the testimony he said he knew of no connection between the replacements requested and operations against the president's circle. In June 2020, a filing by Moro's defense pointed to a coincidence of dates between the first wish to replace the Rio PF (August 2019) and the Queiroz defense's request for access to a confidential Rio de Janeiro Federal Police inquiry, and cited Paulo Marinho's account. In an interview with Flow Podcast (date not located), Moro reportedly said Bolsonaro reacted with irritation to Toffoli's decision on Coaf, which benefited Flávio. The 'rachadinha' investigation in Flávio's office at the Rio legislature (Alerj) is by the Rio de Janeiro Public Prosecutor's Office (state-level); in the sources read, there is no document linking Inq 4831 to that investigation.", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "Moro's defense argued, in a filing, that the wish to replace the Rio superintendency coincided with the Queiroz defense's request for access to a confidential Rio de Janeiro Federal Police inquiry, which would indirectly mention Flávio.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-defesa-moro-queiroz-saadi" ] }, { "autor": "pessoa:paulo-marinho", "texto": "Marinho, Flávio's alternate senator, told Folha that a Federal Police (PF) chief investigator warned Flávio of an operation that would hit Queiroz.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-marinho-alegacao-vazamento-flavio" ] }, { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "According to Revista Fórum (October 21, 2026), in an interview with Flow Podcast (date not located; video not seen), Moro reportedly said that Bolsonaro began weakening anticorruption mechanisms out of fear of investigations into relatives. Sole source; the article carries no response from Bolsonaro or Flávio.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-moro-flow-coaf-flavio" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f04-moro-nao-alegou-relacao-operacoes", "evid:f04-defesa-moro-queiroz-saadi", "evid:f04-marinho-alegacao-vazamento-flavio", "evid:f04-flavio-negativa-marinho", "evid:f04-moro-flow-coaf-flavio", "evid:f04-moro-coletiva-2026-04-06" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "texto": "Said on April 24, 2020 that he had never asked for a relative to be shielded.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-bolsonaro-resposta-24abr" ], "fala": "fala:bolsonaro-resposta-nunca-pedi-blindar" }, { "autor": "pessoa:flavio-bolsonaro", "texto": "Categorically denied Marinho's account.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-flavio-negativa-marinho" ], "fala": "fala:flavio-nota-nega-marinho" } ], "decisoes": [], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "No court decision on the hypothesis linking the Rio Federal Police (PF) to the investigation of Flávio. The Office of the Prosecutor General (PGR) and the Supreme Federal Court (STF) indicated in 2025 that they want to verify 'interference in investigations involving himself, his relatives, and allies,' without naming a specific case (STF, October 16, 2025). Inquiry into the alleged Furna da Onça leak: outcome not read. According to Revista Fórum (October 21, 2026), Flávio was indicted in 2020 and the rachadinha case was closed after the annulment of evidence, without a ruling on the merits (not checked in a judicial source). Inq 4831 open according to the latest news located (April 12, 2026).", "evid": [ "evid:f04-reabertura-inq4831-2025" ] }, "falas": [ "fala:flavio-nota-nega-marinho", "fala:bolsonaro-resposta-nunca-pedi-blindar" ], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf" }, { "id": "ep:inquerito-4831-stf", "titulo": "Inquiry 4831 at the Supreme Federal Court (STF): from opening to reopening (2020–2026)", "nucleo": "moro-bolsonaro-pf", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:celso-de-mello", "pessoa:alexandre-de-moraes", "pessoa:augusto-aras", "pessoa:lindora-araujo", "pessoa:paulo-gonet", "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "pessoa:sergio-moro" ], "resumo": "Opened on April 27, 2020 by Celso de Mello at Aras's request. Testimony from Moro (May 2, 2020) and Bolsonaro (November 3, 2021). Final Federal Police (PF) report in March 2022: no proof of interference. The Office of the Prosecutor General (PGR) asks for dismissal on September 19, 2022. Moraes keeps the inquiry open; on May 17, 2024 he asks the PGR to consider ratifying the dismissal; on 10/15–16/2025 the PGR asks for further investigative steps and the STF reopens; according to Gazeta do Povo (April 12, 2026), the PF delivered a new report on April 2, 2026, which analyzed Inq 4781 and 4828 and again concluded there was no interference. Open according to the latest news located (April 12, 2026).", "acusacao": [], "evidencias": [ "evid:f04-inq4831-abertura-2020-04-27", "evid:f04-moro-depoimento-2020-05-02", "evid:f04-bolsonaro-depoimento-rio-complicado", "evid:f04-inq4831-prorrogacao-2021", "evid:f04-pf-relatorio-2022", "evid:f04-pgr-arquivamento-2022-09-19", "evid:f04-moraes-pede-pgr-2024-05-17", "evid:f04-reabertura-inq4831-2025", "evid:f04-pf-relatorio-2026" ], "respostas": [], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2020-04-27", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice rapporteur", "processo": "Pet 8802 (autuada depois como Inq 4831)", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "Authorized the opening of the inquiry at the Prosecutor General's request to investigate the facts reported by Moro.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-inq4831-abertura-2020-04-27" ] }, { "data": "2020-05-22", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice rapporteur", "processo": "Inq 4831", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "Decision reported on May 22, 2020. Released the video and transcript of the ministerial meeting of April 22, 2020.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-reuniao-video-liberado" ] }, { "data": "2025-10-16", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice rapporteur", "processo": "Inq 4831", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "Reopened the investigations at the request of the Office of the Prosecutor General (PGR), for supplementary investigative steps.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-reabertura-inq4831-2025" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-04-12", "texto": "Inquiry open according to the latest news located (April 12, 2026), with no indictment or dismissal in the sources read. According to Gazeta do Povo (sole, unofficial source), the Federal Police (PF) delivered to Moraes on April 2, 2026 a report that analyzed Inq 4781 and 4828, and the report was sent to Gonet. We did not find a statement by the PGR or a later decision; no check was made at the Supreme Federal Court (STF).", "evid": [ "evid:f04-pf-relatorio-2026" ] }, "falas": [], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf" }, { "id": "ep:moro-politica-aliancas-2021-2026", "titulo": "Moro after the break: parties, candidacies, and alliances (2021–2026)", "nucleo": "atuacao", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:jair-bolsonaro", "pessoa:flavio-bolsonaro", "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol" ], "resumo": "Podemos (November 10, 2021, presidential pre-candidacy); União Brasil (March 31, 2022, withdrawal from the Presidency race); senator for Paraná (October 2, 2022); support for Bolsonaro in the runoff (October 4, 2022); 'I am not a Bolsonaro supporter' (May 23, 2023); PL (March 24, 2026); governor-elect of Paraná (October 4, 2026, first round); support for Flávio Bolsonaro in the runoff (October 22, 2026). The 2020 accusations were neither withdrawn nor repeated in the statements located; in April 2026 he dodged a question on the subject, according to Revista Fórum.", "acusacao": [], "evidencias": [ "evid:f04-moro-podemos-2021", "evid:f04-moro-uniao-2022", "evid:f04-moro-senador-2022", "evid:f04-moro-apoio-bolsonaro-2022", "evid:f04-bolsonaro-superado-2022", "evid:f04-moro-nao-bolsonarista-2023", "evid:f04-moro-pl-2026", "evid:f04-moro-eleito-governador-2026", "evid:f04-moro-apoio-flavio-2026-10-22", "evid:f04-moro-coletiva-2026-04-06" ], "respostas": [], "decisoes": [], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "Moro is a senator (PL-PR; eight-year term begun in 2023) and governor-elect of Paraná (inauguration scheduled for January 1, 2027). He declared support for Flávio Bolsonaro in the October 25, 2026 presidential runoff, against Lula (statement of October 22, 2026 according to NP Diário, sole regional source). We have not confirmed whether he will resign from the Senate.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-moro-eleito-governador-2026", "evid:f04-moro-apoio-flavio-2026-10-22" ] }, "falas": [ "fala:moro-tuite-apoio-bolsonaro-2022-10-04", "fala:bolsonaro-2022-10-04-superado", "fala:bolsonaro-2022-passado-e-passado", "fala:moro-2023-nao-bolsonarista", "fala:moro-2023-apoiei-segundo-turno", "fala:moro-2026-03-24-parana-flavio", "fala:moro-2026-10-22-apoio-flavio-segundo-turno" ], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf" }, { "id": "ep:acoes-eleitorais-moro-tre-pr-tse-2024", "titulo": "Actions to revoke Moro's mandate before the Paraná Regional Electoral Court (TRE-PR) and the Superior Electoral Court (TSE) (2024)", "nucleo": "atuacao", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:sergio-moro" ], "resumo": "The PL and the PT/PCdoB/PV federation accused Moro of abuse of economic power, undeclared campaign funds (caixa 2), and improper use of the media during the 2021–2022 presidential pre-campaign, before his Senate candidacy. The Paraná Regional Electoral Court (TRE-PR) rejected the claims by 5 to 2 on April 9, 2024; the Superior Electoral Court (TSE) denied the appeals unanimously on May 21, 2024. The sanctions sought were electoral (revocation of mandate and ineligibility).", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "org:pl", "texto": "The PL and the PT/PCdoB/PV federation asserted that pre-campaign spending with party funds created an unlawful advantage (amounts alleged: PL, R$7 million; PT, R$21 million).", "evid": [ "evid:f04-tre-pr-2024" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f04-tre-pr-2024", "evid:f04-tse-2024" ], "respostas": [ { "texto": "The rapporteur at the Paraná Regional Electoral Court (TRE-PR) identified only about R$59 thousand in specific expenses (InfoMoney, April 9, 2024).", "evid": [ "evid:f04-tre-pr-2024" ] } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2024-04-09", "orgao": "org:tre-pr", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "0604176-51.2022.6.16.0000 (PL) e 0604298-64.2022.6.16.0000 (Federação Brasil da Esperança)", "tipo": "eleitoral", "resultado": "Rejected the revocation of mandate by 5 votes to 2.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-tre-pr-2024" ] }, { "data": "2024-05-21", "orgao": "org:tse", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "recursos nos processos 0604176-51.2022.6.16.0000 (PL) e 0604298-64.2022.6.16.0000 (Federação Brasil da Esperança)", "tipo": "eleitoral", "resultado": "Denied the appeals unanimously; rapporteur Floriano de Azevedo Marques considered R$777 thousand irregular but found no convincing proof of diversion of funds or a sham candidacy.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-tse-2024" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "Mandate upheld. The May 21, 2024 report states that an appeal was possible; no later appeal located.", "evid": [ "evid:f04-tse-2024" ] }, "falas": [], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f04-moro-bolsonaro-pf" }, { "id": "ep:suspeicao-moro-hc-164493", "titulo": "Moro's bias ruling in the triplex case (HC 164.493)", "nucleo": "atuacao", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:lula", "pessoa:gilmar-mendes", "pessoa:edson-fachin", "pessoa:ricardo-lewandowski", "pessoa:carmen-lucia", "pessoa:nunes-marques" ], "resumo": "Lula's defense asked the STF, by habeas corpus, to declare Moro biased (partial) to try the triplex case. The trial in the Second Panel began in 2018 and was concluded on March 23, 2021, when Cármen Lúcia changed her vote and formed a 3-to-2 majority for the bias ruling. On March 8, 2021, Fachin had declared the HC moot upon recognizing the lack of jurisdiction of Curitiba; the full court (Plenary), on June 23, 2021, upheld the Panel's decision by 7 to 4. On June 24, 2021, Gilmar Mendes extended the bias ruling to two more criminal cases. The bias was recognized in a habeas corpus, and not in a conviction or an acquittal on the merits; the dissenting votes questioned the procedural route and the lawfulness of the conversations used.", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:lula", "texto": "Lula's defense argued that Moro acted with bias in handling the triplex case and, among other arguments cited by the STF, that his acceptance of Jair Bolsonaro's invitation to the Ministry of Justice indicated political motivation.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-suspeicao-defesa-argumentos" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f05-suspeicao-turma-votos", "evid:f05-suspeicao-turma-placar-conjur", "evid:f05-suspeicao-efeito-anulacao", "evid:f05-suspeicao-defesa-argumentos", "evid:f05-suspeicao-fundamentos-conjur", "evid:f05-suspeicao-nunes-marques-contra", "evid:f05-suspeicao-fachin-prejudicado", "evid:f05-suspeicao-plenario-7x4", "evid:f05-suspeicao-plenario-votos", "evid:f05-suspeicao-plenario-marco-aurelio-fux", "evid:f05-suspeicao-plenario-conjur", "evid:f05-suspeicao-extensao-gilmar" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:nunes-marques", "texto": "In a dissenting vote in the Second Panel, Nunes Marques argued that the bias should be discussed in a bias challenge, with evidence and adversarial proceedings, and that the released conversations between Moro and the task force were unlawfully obtained.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-suspeicao-nunes-marques-contra" ] }, { "autor": "pessoa:luiz-fux", "texto": "In the full court, Fux and Marco Aurélio, in dissent, stated that the Panel could not rule on the bias after the rapporteur had closed the HC and that the evidence used was unlawful.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-suspeicao-plenario-marco-aurelio-fux" ], "fala": "fala:fux-plenario-2021-prova-ilicita" } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2021-03-08", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice rapporteur (single-justice decision)", "processo": "HC 164.493 / HC 193.726", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "Fachin declared the 13th Court of Curitiba lacked jurisdiction and found HC 164.493 (bias) moot; the defense appealed.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-suspeicao-fachin-prejudicado" ] }, { "data": "2021-03-23", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Second Panel", "processo": "HC 164.493", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "By majority (3 to 2: Gilmar Mendes, Lewandowski and Cármen Lúcia in favor; Fachin and Nunes Marques against), Moro was declared biased; all of his decisions in the triplex case were annulled, including pre-trial acts. It is not a conviction or an acquittal on the merits.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-suspeicao-turma-votos", "evid:f05-suspeicao-turma-placar-conjur", "evid:f05-suspeicao-efeito-anulacao" ] }, { "data": "2021-06-23", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "HC 193.726 (2º agravo regimental da defesa de Lula)", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "By 7 votes to 4, the Second Panel's decision was upheld; Fachin, Barroso, Marco Aurélio and Fux dissented. The annulment of Moro's decisions in the triplex case was upheld.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-suspeicao-plenario-7x4", "evid:f05-suspeicao-plenario-votos" ] }, { "data": "2021-06-24", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice Gilmar Mendes", "processo": "HC 164.493 (extensão)", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "Bias ruling extended to the criminal cases on the Atibaia farm and the Instituto Lula properties (date of the news report).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-suspeicao-extensao-gilmar" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "The declaration of Moro's bias has been upheld by the STF full court since June 23, 2021 and was extended to Atibaia and the Instituto Lula. The triplex and Atibaia cases were closed or had the indictment rejected in the Federal Court of the DF (see ep:incompetencia-13-vara-hc-193726). In the sources consulted, we did not locate a later decision reversing the bias ruling. In open sources, we did not locate Moro's public statement on the decision.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-suspeicao-plenario-7x4", "evid:f05-suspeicao-extensao-gilmar" ] }, "falas": [ "fala:fux-plenario-2021-prova-ilicita" ], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f05-atuacao" }, { "id": "ep:incompetencia-13-vara-hc-193726", "titulo": "Lack of jurisdiction of the 13th Federal Court of Curitiba in Lula's cases (HC 193.726)", "nucleo": "atuacao", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:lula", "pessoa:edson-fachin", "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:nunes-marques", "pessoa:alexandre-de-moraes" ], "resumo": "On March 8, 2021, in HC 193.726, Fachin declared that the 13th Federal Court of Curitiba lacked jurisdiction over Lula's criminal cases on the Guarujá triplex, the Atibaia farm, and the Instituto Lula (headquarters and donations), finding that the facts were not directly related to the diversion of funds at Petrobras; he annulled the court's decisions and sent the case files to the Federal Court of the Federal District (DF). The full court (Plenary) confirmed by 8 to 3 and set the DF as the venue on April 22, 2021. In the Federal Court of the DF, the Atibaia farm indictment was rejected on August 21, 2021 and the triplex case was dismissed on January 27, 2022, both with extinction of punishability by statute of limitations for defendants over 70. The annulment for lack of jurisdiction did not examine Lula's guilt or innocence; the cases were closed on statute-of-limitations grounds and for lack of just cause.", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "org:mpf", "texto": "The Office of the Prosecutor General (PGR) appealed Fachin's decision, asking the full court (Plenary) to recognize the 13th Federal Court's jurisdiction and preserve the procedural and decision-making acts.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-incompetencia-pgr-recurso" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f05-incompetencia-fachin-2021-03-08", "evid:f05-incompetencia-pgr-recurso", "evid:f05-incompetencia-plenario-8x3", "evid:f05-incompetencia-moraes-sp", "evid:f05-incompetencia-foro-df", "evid:f05-incompetencia-atibaia-denuncia-rejeitada", "evid:f05-incompetencia-triplex-mpf-arquivamento", "evid:f05-incompetencia-triplex-arquivado", "evid:f05-incompetencia-triplex-monitor" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:nunes-marques", "texto": "Nunes Marques, joined by Marco Aurélio and Fux, dissented and would have kept the 13th Federal Court's jurisdiction, finding a connection with Lava Jato.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-incompetencia-plenario-8x3" ] } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2021-03-08", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice rapporteur (single-justice decision)", "processo": "HC 193.726", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "Lack of jurisdiction of the 13th Federal Court of Curitiba declared for the triplex, Atibaia, and Instituto Lula cases; decisions annulled, including the convictions; case files sent to the Federal Court of the DF.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-incompetencia-fachin-2021-03-08" ] }, { "data": "2021-04-15", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "HC 193.726 (agravo regimental da PGR)", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "By 8 votes to 3, the lack of jurisdiction and the annulment upheld; dissenters Nunes Marques, Marco Aurélio, and Fux.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-incompetencia-plenario-8x3" ] }, { "data": "2021-04-22", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "HC 193.726", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "By majority, the Federal Court of the DF set as the competent venue; Moraes and Lewandowski outvoted in part (they preferred São Paulo).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-incompetencia-foro-df" ] }, { "data": "2021-08-21", "orgao": "org:justica-federal-df", "instancia": "12th Federal Criminal Court (Judge Pollyana Kelly Alves)", "processo": "Ação penal do sítio de Atibaia (número não informado)", "tipo": "criminal", "resultado": "Indictment rejected for lack of just cause and punishability extinguished, by statute of limitations, for defendants over 70 (Lula, Emílio Odebrecht, Alexandrino Alencar, Léo Pinheiro). Appeal was possible.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-incompetencia-atibaia-denuncia-rejeitada" ] }, { "data": "2022-01-27", "orgao": "org:justica-federal-df", "instancia": "12th Federal Criminal Court (Judge Pollyana Kelly Alves)", "processo": "Ação penal do triplex (número não informado)", "tipo": "criminal", "resultado": "Case dismissed and punishability declared extinguished by statute of limitations, at the request of the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) (December 2021).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-incompetencia-triplex-arquivado", "evid:f05-incompetencia-triplex-mpf-arquivamento", "evid:f05-incompetencia-triplex-monitor" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "In the sources consulted, the triplex and Atibaia criminal cases are closed on statute-of-limitations grounds and for lack of just cause; we did not find an appeal or later decision. We did not find the outcome of the Instituto Lula cases (headquarters and donations), also annulled by the Supreme Federal Court (STF). No conviction in force in these cases in the sources consulted.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-incompetencia-atibaia-denuncia-rejeitada", "evid:f05-incompetencia-triplex-arquivado" ] }, "falas": [], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f05-atuacao" }, { "id": "ep:interceptacao-lula-dilma-2016", "titulo": "Interception and release of the Lula–Dilma conversation (March 16, 2016)", "nucleo": "atuacao", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:lula", "pessoa:dilma-rousseff", "pessoa:teori-zavascki" ], "resumo": "On March 16, 2016 Moro ordered the interception of Lula's phone to stop at 11:12:22 a.m.; at 1:32 p.m. a dialogue with then-President Dilma Rousseff was captured, and Moro lifted the secrecy of the conversations on 3/16 and 3/17. The Presidency of the Republic filed Rcl 23.457 alleging usurpation of the Supreme Federal Court (STF)'s jurisdiction. On June 13, 2016 Teori Zavascki overturned Moro's decisions that lifted the secrecy and declared null the conversation captured after the order to stop, without ruling on the legitimacy of the interception itself. Moro apologized to the STF on March 29, 2016. The Special Court of the Federal Regional Court of the 4th Region (TRF4) dismissed, on September 22, 2016, a complaint against Moro by 13 votes to 1.", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:dilma-rousseff", "texto": "Through the Office of the Attorney General (AGU), the Presidency of the Republic alleged that Moro usurped the Supreme Federal Court (STF)'s jurisdiction by keeping and releasing conversations of the President of the Republic captured in the interception of Lula.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-rcl23457-inicial" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f05-rcl23457-inicial", "evid:f05-rcl23457-liminar", "evid:f05-rcl23457-ordem-interrupcao", "evid:f05-rcl23457-pgr-improcedencia", "evid:f05-rcl23457-teori-sem-juizo-interceptacao", "evid:f05-rcl23457-dispositivo", "evid:f05-rcl23457-noticia-stf", "evid:f05-moro-oficio-escusas", "evid:f05-moro-oficio-justa-causa", "evid:f05-moro-reanalise-1332", "evid:f05-rcl23457-trf4-corte-especial", "evid:f05-rcl23457-conjur" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "In an official letter to the Supreme Federal Court (STF), Moro apologized, stated that he had not intended to cause such effects, and maintained that the interception had just cause and that lifting secrecy was the court's usual practice.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-moro-oficio-escusas", "evid:f05-moro-oficio-justa-causa" ], "fala": "fala:moro-oficio-stf-2016-escusas" }, { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "In reviewing his order, Moro wrote that he had not noticed the 1:32 p.m. dialogue and did not see it as of greater relevance.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-moro-reanalise-1332" ], "fala": "fala:moro-despacho-2016-dialogo-1332" }, { "autor": "org:mpf", "texto": "The Prosecutor General opined that the complaint should be dismissed as unfounded, understanding that any improper lifting of secrecy would not amount to usurpation of the Supreme Federal Court (STF)'s jurisdiction.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-rcl23457-pgr-improcedencia" ] } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2016-03-22", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Rapporteur justice (preliminary injunction)", "processo": "Rcl 23.457", "tipo": "constitucional", "resultado": "Preliminary injunction granted that suspended and brought to the Supreme Federal Court (STF) the request to break confidentiality and related proceedings; endorsed by the full court (Plenary) on March 31, 2016.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-rcl23457-liminar" ] }, { "data": "2016-06-13", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice Teori Zavascki", "processo": "Rcl 23.457", "tipo": "constitucional", "resultado": "Complaint upheld in part: violation of the Supreme Federal Court (STF)'s jurisdiction recognized, the decisions of 3/16 and March 17, 2016 that lifted secrecy overturned, and the content of conversations captured after the order to stop declared null; cases without officials entitled to special jurisdiction sent back to the 13th Federal Court.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-rcl23457-dispositivo", "evid:f05-rcl23457-noticia-stf" ] }, { "data": "2016-09-22", "orgao": "org:trf4", "instancia": "Special Court", "processo": "Representação de grupo de 19 advogados (segundo o Conjur) contra Moro (número não informado)", "tipo": "disciplinar", "resultado": "By 13 votes to 1 (dissent by Rogério Favreto), the complaint was dismissed; the rapporteur, Rômulo Pizzolatti, saw no sign of a disciplinary offense.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-rcl23457-trf4-corte-especial" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "Teori Zavascki's decision of June 13, 2016 remains the Supreme Federal Court (STF)'s reference: it overturned the lifting of secrecy and annulled the conversation captured after the order to stop, without annulling the interception itself. The facts were cited in 2021 by Gilmar Mendes among Moro's acts in extending the bias ruling. The disciplinary complaint at the Federal Regional Court of the 4th Region (TRF4) was dismissed. We did not find the outcome of other complaints at the National Council of Justice (CNJ) in open sources.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-rcl23457-dispositivo", "evid:f05-rcl23457-trf4-corte-especial" ] }, "falas": [ "fala:moro-oficio-stf-2016-escusas", "fala:moro-despacho-2016-dialogo-1332", "fala:teori-rcl23457-decisao-comprometida", "fala:teori-rcl23457-decisao-precoce" ], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f05-atuacao" }, { "id": "ep:delacao-palocci-2018", "titulo": "Release of Antonio Palocci's plea agreement (October 1, 2018)", "nucleo": "atuacao", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:antonio-palocci", "pessoa:lula" ], "resumo": "On October 1, 2018, six days before the first round, Moro lifted the secrecy of the first statement of Antonio Palocci's cooperation, which was part of a Lava Jato criminal case against Lula. The PT filed a complaint against Moro with the National Council of Justice (CNJ), which asked for explanations on October 4, 2018. Moro responded that the measure was necessary to gauge benefits in a possible sentence, that there was no electoral intent, and that the Judiciary cannot stop because of an election. In 2021, Gilmar Mendes included the lifting of secrecy among the acts underlying the extension of Moro's bias ruling.", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "org:pt", "texto": "The PT filed a complaint with the National Council of Justice (CNJ) against Moro over lifting the secrecy of Palocci's plea agreement six days before the first round.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-palocci-cnj-pt" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f05-palocci-moro-despacho", "evid:f05-palocci-moro-cnj-justificativa", "evid:f05-palocci-cnj-pt", "evid:f05-palocci-gilmar-fundamento" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "Moro told the National Council of Justice (CNJ) that the release was necessary for a possible calibration of the cooperation benefits, that the police only presented corroborating elements on 09/24, that there was no intent to influence the elections, and that the testimony concerned Lula, without mentioning the PT candidate.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-palocci-moro-cnj-justificativa" ], "fala": "fala:moro-cnj-2018-sem-intencao-eleitoral" } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2018-10-01", "orgao": "org:13-vara-federal-curitiba", "instancia": "Judge Sergio Moro", "processo": "Ação penal da Lava Jato contra Lula (apartamento em São Bernardo do Campo e terreno do Instituto Lula; número não informado)", "tipo": "criminal", "resultado": "Secrecy lifted on Antonio Palocci's Cooperation Statement 1.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-palocci-moro-despacho" ] }, { "data": "2018-10-04", "orgao": "org:cnj", "instancia": "National Internal Affairs Office of Justice (Corregedoria Nacional de Justiça)", "processo": "Representação do PT contra Moro (número não confirmado)", "tipo": "disciplinar", "resultado": "Internal affairs judge asked Moro for explanations; outcome not located.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-palocci-cnj-pt" ] }, { "data": "2021-06-24", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice Gilmar Mendes", "processo": "HC 164.493 (extensão)", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "Lifting of the secrecy of Palocci's plea agreement during the 2018 campaign cited among the common facts underlying the extension of Moro's bias ruling to the Atibaia case and the Instituto Lula case.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-palocci-gilmar-fundamento" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "The lifting of secrecy is cited by the Supreme Federal Court (STF) (2021) as one of the facts in the 'setting' of Moro's partial conduct; the bias ruling stands (see ep:suspeicao-moro-hc-164493). We did not find in open sources the outcome of the PT's complaint to the National Council of Justice (CNJ). The full text of Moro's order and the position of the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) on the release were not opened.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-palocci-gilmar-fundamento", "evid:f05-palocci-cnj-pt" ] }, "falas": [ "fala:moro-decisao-2018-palocci-publicidade", "fala:moro-cnj-2018-sem-intencao-eleitoral" ], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f05-atuacao" }, { "id": "ep:powerpoint-dallagnol-condenacao-civil", "titulo": "Dallagnol's PowerPoint and the civil judgment for moral damages to Lula", "nucleo": "atuacao", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "pessoa:lula", "pessoa:luis-felipe-salomao", "pessoa:carmen-lucia" ], "resumo": "At a press conference in September 2016 (the 14th, according to InfoMoney of September 15, 2016), Dallagnol presented PowerPoint slides in explaining the triplex indictment against Lula. Lula went to civil court and asked for R$1 million in moral damages; the ordinary courts ruled against him. On March 22, 2022 the Fourth Panel of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), by majority, ordered Dallagnol, personally, to pay R$75 thousand; the motions for clarification were rejected unanimously (news of August 10, 2022), and the Supreme Federal Court (STF) declined to hear the extraordinary appeal in 2024. According to a report, in November 2025 Dallagnol deposited R$146,847.13, an amount financed, he said, by donations. It is a civil judgment (damages), not criminal. In 2020 the National Council of the Public Prosecutor's Office (CNMP) did not punish the episode in the disciplinary sphere because of the statute of limitations.", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:lula", "texto": "Lula argued in the civil action that the 2016 presentation harmed his honor and image, seeking R$1 million in damages.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-powerpoint-stj-condenacao" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f05-powerpoint-stj-condenacao", "evid:f05-powerpoint-stj-fundamentos", "evid:f05-powerpoint-stj-embargos", "evid:f05-powerpoint-stf-hc-terceiro", "evid:f05-powerpoint-stf-cl-2024-04", "evid:f05-powerpoint-stf-turma-2024-06", "evid:f05-powerpoint-pagamento-2025", "evid:f05-powerpoint-cnmp-prescricao", "evid:f05-powerpoint-cnmp-8-de-10", "evid:f05-powerpoint-coletiva-2016-09-14" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "texto": "In the motions for clarification, Dallagnol and the ANPR argued that Dallagnol lacked standing as a defendant, since he acted as a member of the Public Prosecutor's Office; Dallagnol said, after the payment, according to the report, that he would give the PowerPoint again and did not regret it.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-powerpoint-stj-embargos", "evid:f05-powerpoint-pagamento-2025" ] } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2020-08-25", "orgao": "org:cnmp", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "Pedido de providências da defesa de Lula (número não informado)", "tipo": "disciplinar", "resultado": "No disciplinary proceeding (PAD not opened), because the applicable penalty was time-barred; the earlier reprimand had its effects suspended by a decision of Fux (August 17, 2020, according to Gazeta do Povo). 8 of 10 council members saw grounds for a proceeding.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-powerpoint-cnmp-prescricao", "evid:f05-powerpoint-cnmp-8-de-10" ] }, { "data": "2022-03-22", "orgao": "org:stj", "instancia": "Fourth Panel", "processo": "REsp 1.842.613", "tipo": "civil", "resultado": "By majority, ordered to pay R$75 thousand in moral damages to Lula, plus 20% in attorney's fees and court costs.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-powerpoint-stj-condenacao", "evid:f05-powerpoint-stj-fundamentos" ] }, { "data": "2022-08-10", "orgao": "org:stj", "instancia": "Fourth Panel", "processo": "REsp 1.842.613 (embargos de declaração)", "tipo": "civil", "resultado": "News of August 10, 2022 (session date not stated). Motions for clarification by Dallagnol, Lula, and the ANPR rejected unanimously.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-powerpoint-stj-embargos" ] }, { "data": "2024-04-22", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice Cármen Lúcia (single-justice decision)", "processo": "RE 1.433.814 (número informado em notícia do STF de 2023)", "tipo": "civil", "resultado": "Appeal against the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) decision rejected (indirect constitutional offense).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-powerpoint-stf-cl-2024-04", "evid:f05-powerpoint-stf-hc-terceiro" ] }, { "data": "2024-06-11", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "First Panel (virtual session)", "processo": "RE 1.433.814 (agravo)", "tipo": "civil", "resultado": "Rapporteur's decision upheld unanimously; Zanin recused.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-powerpoint-stf-turma-2024-06" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "Civil judgment upheld by the STF in 2024; res judicata (final and unappealable status) not confirmed. According to a report dated December 19, 2025 (single source), Dallagnol deposited R$146,847.13 on November 27, 2025 (an amount set at R$135.4 thousand by the TJ-SP in July 2025, plus attorney's fees), stating in a video, according to the report, that he had covered the payment with donations from more than 12 thousand people (about R$835 thousand) and had given the surplus (about R$688 thousand) to philanthropic hospitals. We did not locate a certificate of res judicata or an accounting of the funds raised.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-powerpoint-pagamento-2025", "evid:f05-powerpoint-stf-turma-2024-06" ] }, "falas": [], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f05-atuacao" }, { "id": "ep:sancoes-cnmp-dallagnol", "titulo": "CNMP sanctions and disciplinary proceedings against Dallagnol", "nucleo": "atuacao", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "pessoa:renan-calheiros", "pessoa:katia-abreu", "pessoa:diogo-castor-de-mattos" ], "resumo": "The CNMP imposed two disciplinary sanctions on Dallagnol: a warning (November 26, 2019, PAD 1.00898/2018-99, for criticism of STF justices on CBN radio, 8 to 3) and a censure (September 8, 2020, PAD 1.00982/2019-48, for tweets against the election of Renan Calheiros to the Senate, by majority). Other proceedings were closed, expired under the statute of limitations, or were not opened: the PowerPoint one (statute of limitations, 2020), the lectures one (closed, 2017), and the one on the content of the leaked messages (closed by the inspector in June 27, 2019). Requests for his removal and for his removal from the coordination of the task force did not succeed in the sources consulted (precautionary removal denied by 12 to 0 in September 2019; the 2020 requests were suspended by Celso de Mello and became moot, with no result located). The PAD over the Lava Jato billboard was opened against federal prosecutor Diogo Castor de Mattos, not against Dallagnol.", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:renan-calheiros", "texto": "Renan Calheiros filed a complaint against Dallagnol over Twitter posts about the election for the presidency of the Senate, alleging party-political activity, and asked for his precautionary removal.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-cnmp-censura-2020", "evid:f05-cnmp-afastamento-negado-2019" ] }, { "autor": "pessoa:katia-abreu", "texto": "Senator Kátia Abreu asked for Dallagnol's removal from the coordination of the task force in the public interest.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-cnmp-remocao-2020-celso", "evid:f05-cnmp-pauta-2020-remocao" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f05-cnmp-advertencia-2019", "evid:f05-cnmp-liminar-pad-2019", "evid:f05-cnmp-censura-2020", "evid:f05-cnmp-afastamento-negado-2019", "evid:f05-cnmp-remocao-2020-celso", "evid:f05-cnmp-pauta-2020-remocao", "evid:f05-cnmp-outdoor-castor", "evid:f05-cnmp-palestras-2017", "evid:f05-cnmp-vazamentos-arquivado-2019", "evid:f05-powerpoint-cnmp-prescricao" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "texto": "Dallagnol's defense obtained an injunction in the Federal Court of Paraná (August 26, 2019) suspending the PAD for the warning until full defense rights were guaranteed and, on August 17, 2020, the suspension of two CNMP proceedings by decision of Celso de Mello; the inspector, in 2019, found that the tweets amounted only to a breach of decorum (censure).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-cnmp-liminar-pad-2019", "evid:f05-cnmp-remocao-2020-celso", "evid:f05-cnmp-afastamento-negado-2019" ] } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2017-11-28", "orgao": "org:cnmp", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "Reclamações disciplinares 1.00553/2017-36 e 1.00610/2017-22", "tipo": "disciplinar", "resultado": "Unanimously, the closing of the case was upheld: the lectures were classified as teaching; the deputies' appeal was denied.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-cnmp-palestras-2017" ] }, { "data": "2019-06-27", "orgao": "org:cnmp", "instancia": "National Inspector (Orlando Rochadel)", "processo": "Apuração sobre mensagens vazadas (número não informado)", "tipo": "disciplinar", "resultado": "Closed for lack of evidence and because there would have been no breach of duty even if the messages existed.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-cnmp-vazamentos-arquivado-2019" ] }, { "data": "2019-09-10", "orgao": "org:cnmp", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "Processo do senador Renan Calheiros (número não informado)", "tipo": "disciplinar", "resultado": "By 12 votes to 0, precautionary removal denied; opening of the PAD postponed by a request for review.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-cnmp-afastamento-negado-2019" ] }, { "data": "2019-11-26", "orgao": "org:cnmp", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "PAD 1.00898/2018-99", "tipo": "disciplinar", "resultado": "By 8 votes to 3, a warning was imposed for a breach of decorum and civility (CBN interview, August 15, 2018).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-cnmp-advertencia-2019" ] }, { "data": "2020-08-25", "orgao": "org:cnmp", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "Pedido de providências da defesa de Lula (PowerPoint)", "tipo": "disciplinar", "resultado": "Proceeding not opened; statute of limitations.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-powerpoint-cnmp-prescricao" ] }, { "data": "2020-09-08", "orgao": "org:cnmp", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "PAD 1.00982/2019-48", "tipo": "disciplinar", "resultado": "By majority, a censure was imposed for 14 posts against the election of Renan Calheiros (breach of decorum).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-cnmp-censura-2020" ] }, { "data": "2020-09-22", "orgao": "org:cnmp", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "PAD contra Diogo Castor de Mattos (número não informado)", "tipo": "disciplinar", "resultado": "Unanimously, a PAD was opened against Castor de Mattos over the billboard; Dallagnol is not the one being prosecuted.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-cnmp-outdoor-castor" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "Dallagnol left the MPF in November 2021, with both sanctions (warning and censure) already imposed. The TSE, in 2023, cited 15 proceedings pending at the CNMP at the time of his resignation (see ep:politica-dallagnol-e-moro-processos-eleitorais). In open sources we did not locate the final outcome of the request for his removal by Kátia Abreu (PP 1.00723/2019-53, according to a search result that was not opened) or the reopening, in August 2019, of the inquiry into the messages; the outcome of the billboard PAD was also not located. On August 17, 2020, Justice Fux (STF) suspended the use of the 2019 warning as a prior record, according to Gazeta do Povo; scope and outcome not verified.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-cnmp-advertencia-2019", "evid:f05-cnmp-censura-2020", "evid:f05-powerpoint-cnmp-prescricao" ] }, "falas": [], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f05-atuacao" }, { "id": "ep:diarias-passagens-forca-tarefa-tcu", "titulo": "Per diems and airfare for the task force and the Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) special accounts proceeding", "nucleo": "atuacao", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "pessoa:rodrigo-janot", "pessoa:bruno-dantas", "pessoa:humberto-martins" ], "resumo": "The Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) examined the payment of per diems and airfare to prosecutors assigned from other locations to the Curitiba task force. On August 9, 2022 the Second Chamber ordered, 4 to 0, Dallagnol, Janot, and João Vicente Beraldo Romão to reimburse R$2,831,808 to the Union, with a R$200 thousand fine. It is a conviction by an audit court (court of accounts). Romão was cleared on appeal. On December 5, 2022 the Federal Court in Curitiba annulled the TCU decision as to Dallagnol, and the Federal Regional Court of the 4th Region (TRF4) upheld the annulment (report of September 26, 2024); at the same time the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), in a request to suspend an injunction, authorized the resumption of the special accounts proceeding (2022, 2023, and August 2025).", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:bruno-dantas", "texto": "The rapporteur at the Federal Court of Accounts (TCU), Bruno Dantas, pointed to a lack of grounds for the per diem model and violation of economy and impersonality, calling the expenses uneconomical, unlawful, and illegitimate acts that may amount to willful acts of improbity.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-tcu-2022-08" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f05-tcu-2022-08", "evid:f05-tcu-mpf-resposta", "evid:f05-tcu-sls3133-2022", "evid:f05-tcu-2022-12-anulacao", "evid:f05-tcu-janeiro-2023-agu", "evid:f05-tcu-corte-especial-2023", "evid:f05-tcu-trf4-2024", "evid:f05-tcu-corte-especial-2025", "evid:f05-tcu-corte-especial-2025-migalhas" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "texto": "Dallagnol claimed he was not the authorizing officer for expenditures nor responsible for the task force's administrative structure; the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) stated that the expenses were authorized by Ordinance 41/2014; Dallagnol and Janot said they would appeal.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-tcu-mpf-resposta", "evid:f05-tcu-sls3133-2022" ] } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2022-06-25", "orgao": "org:stj", "instancia": "Presidency (Humberto Martins)", "processo": "SLS 3133", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "Suspended the injunction of the 6th Federal Court of Paraná that had blocked the continuation of the special accounts proceeding (TCE) at the Federal Court of Accounts (TCU).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-tcu-sls3133-2022" ] }, { "data": "2022-08-09", "orgao": "org:tcu", "instancia": "Second Chamber", "processo": "Número não confirmado para o acórdão de 2022 (TCE 006.470/2022-0 citado em 2025 pelo Migalhas)", "tipo": "contas", "resultado": "By 4 votes to 0, Dallagnol, Janot, and Romão ordered to reimburse R$2,831,808 to the Union; R$200 thousand fine. Romão cleared on appeal.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-tcu-2022-08", "evid:f05-tcu-2022-12-anulacao" ] }, { "data": "2022-12-05", "orgao": "org:justica-federal-parana", "instancia": "6th Federal Court of Curitiba (Judge Augusto César Pansini Gonçalves)", "processo": "5033048-90.2022.4.04.7000", "tipo": "administrativa", "resultado": "Annulled the Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) decision as to Dallagnol for lack of standing (he was not the authorizing officer for expenditures), in judicial review of a TCU act.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-tcu-2022-12-anulacao" ] }, { "data": "2023-06-07", "orgao": "org:stj", "instancia": "Special Court", "processo": "SLS 3133", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "By 6 votes to 5, Dallagnol's appeal in SLS 3133 denied (according to Gazeta do Povo); rapporteur Maria Thereza de Assis Moura outvoted.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-tcu-corte-especial-2023" ] }, { "data": "2024-09-26", "orgao": "org:trf4", "instancia": "12th Panel", "processo": "5033048-90.2022.4.04.7000 (apelação da União)", "tipo": "administrativa", "resultado": "Reported on September 26, 2024 (session date and vote tally not stated). The Union's appeal denied; annulment of the Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) decision as to Dallagnol upheld.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-tcu-trf4-2024" ] }, { "data": "2025-08", "orgao": "org:stj", "instancia": "Special Court", "processo": "SLS 3133 (agravo interno)", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "By majority, Dallagnol's interlocutory appeal denied; injunction kept suspended and the effect extended to a new injunction; special accounts proceeding (TCE) resumed.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-tcu-corte-especial-2025", "evid:f05-tcu-corte-especial-2025-migalhas" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "Status disputed on two fronts: (a) the judgment that annulled the Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) decision as to Dallagnol was upheld by the Federal Regional Court of the 4th Region (TRF4), according to Migalhas (report of September 26, 2024); (b) the special accounts proceeding at the TCU (TCE 006.470/2022-0, number cited by Migalhas in 2025) was authorized to proceed by the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), which in August 2025 denied Dallagnol's interlocutory appeal. We did not find in the sources consulted any decision after August 2025 (the search for later news was not repeated on October 24, 2026, so the absence is not confirmed), a ruling on the merits of the TCE, or news of actual reimbursement. We did not find the Supreme Federal Court (STF)'s position; the case does not involve the STF in the open sources.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-tcu-trf4-2024", "evid:f05-tcu-corte-especial-2025" ] }, "falas": [], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f05-atuacao" }, { "id": "ep:fundacao-recursos-petrobras-doj", "titulo": "Foundation with funds from the Petrobras–DOJ agreement (ADPF 568)", "nucleo": "atuacao", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:gabriela-hardt", "pessoa:alexandre-de-moraes", "pessoa:raquel-dodge", "pessoa:rodrigo-badaro" ], "resumo": "In January 2019, the 13th Federal Court of Curitiba (substitute judge Gabriela Hardt) approved an agreement between Petrobras and federal prosecutors of the MPF-PR to direct part of the amount the state-owned company paid to Brazilian authorities, in the agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, to a private foundation of social interest to be managed by the task force. The Office of the Prosecutor General (PGR) (Raquel Dodge) challenged it in ADPF 568; on March 15, 2019 Alexandre de Moraes suspended the agreement and froze the funds. On September 17, 2019 he approved a new agreement (PGR, Chamber of Deputies, and the Union), allocating about R$2.6 billion to education (R$1.6 billion) and environment/Amazon (about R$1 billion); in March 2020, R$1.6 billion was shifted to the Ministry of Health. On August 4, 2026 the National Council of Justice (CNJ) punished Hardt with a two-year forced leave (disponibilidade) for the approval.", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:raquel-dodge", "texto": "The Office of the Prosecutor General (PGR) argued that the first-instance Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) lacked authority to manage the funds and that the Federal Courts had no jurisdiction to approve the agreement.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-fundacao-dodge-argumento", "evid:f05-fundacao-moraes-liminar" ] }, { "autor": "pessoa:rodrigo-badaro", "texto": "The rapporteur at the National Council of Justice (CNJ), Rodrigo Badaró, pointed to 'institutional capture' in an agreement that directed funds to a private foundation run by prosecutors. The report records that the approval took place in less than 48 hours, without hearing the Union.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-fundacao-cnj-hardt" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f05-fundacao-moraes-liminar", "evid:f05-fundacao-dodge-argumento", "evid:f05-fundacao-valor-multa", "evid:f05-fundacao-homologacao-2019-09", "evid:f05-fundacao-migalhas-1-06", "evid:f05-fundacao-nota-moraes-2021", "evid:f05-fundacao-saude-2020", "evid:f05-fundacao-cnj-hardt", "evid:f05-fundacao-cnj-moro-dallagnol", "evid:f05-fundacao-hardt-defesa" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "org:forca-tarefa-lava-jato-curitiba", "texto": "The task force stated, on March 15, 2019, that it had already asked for the suspension of the fund before the PGR's request (Agência Brasil report).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-fundacao-dodge-argumento" ] }, { "autor": "pessoa:gabriela-hardt", "texto": "Hardt's defense argued before the National Council of Justice (CNJ) that she understood the Curitiba Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) and Petrobras to have standing to enter the agreement and that there was no bias-based motivation.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-fundacao-hardt-defesa" ] }, { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "Moro and Dallagnol denied, according to Congresso em Foco, the accusations about informal discussion of the agreement with the judge.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-fundacao-cnj-moro-dallagnol" ] } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2019-03-15", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice Alexandre de Moraes (preliminary injunction)", "processo": "ADPF 568 (relacionadas: ADPF 569 e Rcl 33.667)", "tipo": "constitucional", "resultado": "Effects of the Petrobras–MPF-PR agreement and of its approval by the 13th Federal Court suspended; funds and returns frozen, movable only with authorization from the Supreme Federal Court (STF).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-fundacao-moraes-liminar" ] }, { "data": "2019-09-17", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice Alexandre de Moraes", "processo": "ADPF 568", "tipo": "constitucional", "resultado": "Agreement of September 5, 2019 (PGR, Chamber of Deputies, Union) approved, covering about R$2.6 billion: R$1.6 billion for education, about R$1 billion for the environment; funds to the Treasury; case closed (final and unappealable on October 11, 2019).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-fundacao-homologacao-2019-09", "evid:f05-fundacao-migalhas-1-06", "evid:f05-fundacao-nota-moraes-2021" ] }, { "data": "2020-03-22", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice Alexandre de Moraes", "processo": "ADPF 568 (realocação)", "tipo": "constitucional", "resultado": "Reported on March 22, 2020 (date of the decision not stated). R$1.6 billion reallocated to the Ministry of Health to fight Covid-19, at the request of Prosecutor General Augusto Aras.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-fundacao-saude-2020" ] }, { "data": "2026-08-04", "orgao": "org:cnj", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "PAD contra a juíza Gabriela Hardt (número não informado)", "tipo": "disciplinar", "resultado": "By majority, a penalty of two years of forced leave (disponibilidade) (proportional pay, according to Agência Brasil; the judge continues to receive a salary, according to Congresso em Foco); dissent for one year (Jaceguara Dantas, Paulo Régis Machado Botelho, Fábio Esteves, and Fachin).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-fundacao-cnj-hardt" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "The money did not go to the foundation: Moraes's decision of September 17, 2019 directed the funds to the Treasury and to education and the environment; in 2020, R$1.6 billion was shifted to Health. On August 4, 2026 the National Council of Justice (CNJ) punished the judge who approved the agreement, in a disciplinary administrative proceeding (PAD) that was further extended by 180 days, according to Congresso em Foco. We did not find in open sources the final budget execution of the funds, nor a disciplinary or criminal proceeding against Moro or Dallagnol over this episode; both denied it, according to the report.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-fundacao-nota-moraes-2021", "evid:f05-fundacao-cnj-hardt" ] }, "falas": [], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f05-atuacao" }, { "id": "ep:leniencia-cooperacao-internacional", "titulo": "Leniency agreements and informal international cooperation", "nucleo": "atuacao", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:ricardo-lewandowski", "pessoa:dias-toffoli", "pessoa:lula" ], "resumo": "Messages presented by Lula's defense to the Supreme Federal Court (STF) (Rcl 43.007) suggest, according to the defense, that the task force worked with the FBI and the Swiss prosecutors outside official international cooperation channels. On February 17, 2021 Lewandowski asked the Ministry of Justice for information. On September 6, 2023 Toffoli annulled the evidence obtained from Odebrecht's leniency agreement and its bribery systems, deeming it unusable. The main gap in this entry is the formal response from the task force and the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF), which was not located.", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:lula", "texto": "Lula's defense argued, with messages among prosecutors, that Lava Jato worked with the FBI and the Swiss prosecutors outside official channels, and that the material was concealed from the defense and the Supreme Federal Court (STF).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-coop-defesa-alegacoes" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f05-coop-lewandowski-mj", "evid:f05-coop-defesa-alegacoes", "evid:f05-coop-toffoli-2023", "evid:f05-coop-lewandowski-2023", "evid:f05-coop-moro-dentro-da-lei" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "Moro stated, according to CNN Brasil (September 6, 2023), that Lava Jato acted within the law.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-coop-moro-dentro-da-lei" ] } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2021-02-17", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice Ricardo Lewandowski", "processo": "Rcl 43.007", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "Ministry of Justice ordered to report within five days any international dealings by Lava Jato (2014–2020). Ministry's response not located.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-coop-lewandowski-mj" ] }, { "data": "2023-09-06", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice Dias Toffoli (single-justice decision)", "processo": "Número não informado nas fontes consultadas", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "Decision reported on September 6, 2023. Evidence obtained from Odebrecht's leniency agreement and the bribery systems annulled; declared unusable in criminal, electoral, and improbity cases.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-coop-toffoli-2023" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "Toffoli's decision of September 6, 2023 is the latest one located; we did not verify whether it was confirmed or reviewed by the full court (Plenary), nor the response of the MPF/PGR. We also did not find an open document that proves or disproves the informal cooperation; what exists are messages attributed to prosecutors and the position of Lula's defense. Pending items for follow-up: the Ministry of Justice's response to Rcl 43.007, statements by the PGR and the MPF, the Second Panel's 2021 ruling on leniency.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-coop-toffoli-2023", "evid:f05-coop-lewandowski-mj" ] }, "falas": [], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f05-atuacao" }, { "id": "ep:vaza-jato-spoofing", "titulo": "Vaza Jato: Intercept messages, Operation Spoofing and use by the STF", "nucleo": "atuacao", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "pessoa:ricardo-lewandowski", "pessoa:lula", "pessoa:walter-delgatti" ], "resumo": "On June 9, 2019, The Intercept Brasil published messages attributed to Moro and to Lava Jato prosecutors, which it said it had received from an anonymous source. Moro and the task force spoke of a criminal hack and content taken out of context; in the Senate (June 19, 2019) Moro said he was not acknowledging authenticity. The Federal Police launched Operation Spoofing; in 2023 Walter Delgatti Neto was convicted at first instance to 20 years and 1 month for hacking cell phones. Lewandowski, in Rcl 43.007, gave Lula's defense access to the seized messages (decisions of December 28, 2020 and February 1, 2021) and the Second Panel upheld the access on February 9, 2021. The STF, in recognizing Moro's bias, at times considered the messages and at times excluded them (Cármen Lúcia said she did not consider conversations outside the case record).", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "org:the-intercept-brasil", "texto": "The Intercept stated that the messages indicate 'prohibited collaboration' between the judge and the prosecutors and unethical conduct within the task force.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-vaza-primeiras-reportagens" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f05-vaza-primeiras-reportagens", "evid:f05-vaza-moro-nota", "evid:f05-vaza-forca-tarefa-nota", "evid:f05-vaza-moro-ccj", "evid:f05-vaza-rcl43007-turma", "evid:f05-vaza-rcl43007-fachin", "evid:f05-vaza-rcl43007-sigilo", "evid:f05-vaza-delgatti-2023", "evid:f05-suspeicao-nunes-marques-contra", "evid:f05-suspeicao-plenario-marco-aurelio-fux" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "In a statement of June 9, 2019, Moro said the 'alleged messages' show no abnormality or steering of his conduct as a magistrate, that the source would have committed a criminal hack, and that the site did not contact him.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-vaza-moro-nota" ], "fala": "fala:moro-nota-2019-06-09-vaza-jato" }, { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "On June 19, 2019, in the Senate, Moro said he was not saying that he recognized authenticity, raised the possibility of tampering, and said he no longer had the conversations.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-vaza-moro-ccj" ], "fala": "fala:moro-senado-2019-autenticidade" }, { "autor": "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "texto": "The task force, in a statement, expressed concern about possibly fraudulent messages or messages taken out of context and said it was the victim of a criminal attack by a hacker.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-vaza-forca-tarefa-nota" ] } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2020-12-28", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice Ricardo Lewandowski", "processo": "Rcl 43.007", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "Lula was guaranteed access to the Operation Spoofing messages that concern him; reiterated on February 1, 2021 with an order to the 10th Federal Criminal Court of the DF.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-vaza-rcl43007-sigilo" ] }, { "data": "2021-02-09", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Second Panel", "processo": "Rcl 43.007 (agravo regimental)", "tipo": "processual", "resultado": "News report of February 9, 2021 (session date not given). By majority, the Lava Jato prosecutors' appeal was held inadmissible; Lula's access was upheld; Fachin dissented. The validity of the evidence was not discussed.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-vaza-rcl43007-turma", "evid:f05-vaza-rcl43007-fachin" ] }, { "data": "2023-08-21", "orgao": "org:justica-federal-df", "instancia": "10th Federal Criminal Court of the DF (substitute judge Ricardo Leite)", "processo": "Operação Spoofing (número não informado)", "tipo": "criminal", "resultado": "Walter Delgatti Neto convicted to 20 years and 1 month; five other people convicted (one with judicial pardon). First-instance sentence.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-vaza-delgatti-2023" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "The authenticity of the messages was not declared in any decision we located; Moro said he did not recognize it, the STF allowed Lula's defense to use them in court, and the STF did not decide on the validity of the material in Plenary in the sources consulted. We did not locate Dallagnol's individual written position on authenticity (only the task force's statement); nor PF reports on authenticity; nor the outcome of the appeal in the Spoofing criminal case.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-vaza-rcl43007-turma", "evid:f05-vaza-delgatti-2023" ] }, "falas": [ "fala:moro-nota-2019-06-09-vaza-jato", "fala:moro-senado-2019-autenticidade" ], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f05-atuacao" }, { "id": "ep:atividades-privadas-moro-dallagnol", "titulo": "Private activities: Moro at Alvarez & Marsal and Dallagnol's speaking engagements", "nucleo": "atuacao", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "pessoa:lucas-furtado", "pessoa:bruno-dantas" ], "resumo": "Moro was hired in December 2020 by the consulting firm Alvarez & Marsal, which acted as judicial administrator in Odebrecht's reorganization. The Public Prosecutor's Office at the Federal Court of Accounts (MPTCU) (deputy prosecutor Lucas Furtado) asked for an inquiry into a possible conflict of interest; on January 28, 2022 Moro said he had received US$45 thousand per month, and on January 31, 2022 the MPTCU asked for the case to be closed for loss of purpose, with referral to the Federal Revenue Service. Dallagnol: the National Council of the Public Prosecutor's Office (CNMP) considered the speaking engagements lawful (2017) and, in 2019, messages attributed to him and released by the Intercept suggested a plan for an events company; the entry also covers the disciplinary inquiry that followed.", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "pessoa:lucas-furtado", "texto": "Deputy prosecutor Lucas Furtado asked the Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) for an inquiry and for suspension of payments over an alleged conflict of interest involving Moro at Alvarez & Marsal, which acted in Odebrecht's reorganization.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-am-moro-contratacao", "evid:f05-am-moro-mptcu" ] }, { "autor": "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "texto": "The Intercept and Congresso em Foco reported that Dallagnol discussed creating an events company without appearing as a partner, based on messages attributed to him.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-palestras-intercept-2019" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f05-am-moro-contratacao", "evid:f05-am-moro-remuneracao", "evid:f05-am-moro-mptcu", "evid:f05-palestras-intercept-2019", "evid:f05-cnmp-palestras-2017" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "Moro said he worked in the area of anticorruption policies, without cases involving Lava Jato targets, and disclosed the amounts received in a livestream; the company stated that the contract barred work with clients linked to Lava Jato.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-am-moro-contratacao", "evid:f05-am-moro-remuneracao" ] }, { "autor": "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "texto": "Dallagnol did not comment publicly on the messages on the Sunday of their release, according to the report; he declined an invitation from a Chamber of Deputies committee and wrote on Twitter that working on Lava Jato carries a personal cost. In 2017 the National Council of the Public Prosecutor's Office (CNMP) had already considered the speaking engagements lawful.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-palestras-intercept-2019", "evid:f05-cnmp-palestras-2017" ] } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2017-11-28", "orgao": "org:cnmp", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "Reclamações 1.00553/2017-36 e 1.00610/2017-22", "tipo": "disciplinar", "resultado": "Dismissal (closing of the case) upheld: speaking engagements lawful (teaching).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-cnmp-palestras-2017" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-24", "texto": "We did not find in open sources a Federal Court of Accounts (TCU) decision on the merits of the inquiry involving Moro and Alvarez & Marsal; only the opinion of the Public Prosecutor's Office at the TCU (January 31, 2022, deputy prosecutor Lucas Furtado), which asked for the case to be closed for loss of purpose and referred to the Federal Revenue Service; the rapporteur's decision was not located. On Dallagnol's speaking engagements, the National Council of the Public Prosecutor's Office (CNMP) considered them lawful in 2017; the reopening of the inquiry in 2019 over leaked messages had no outcome located. We did not find the total amount of speaking fees beyond the estimate found in a message attributed to him (about R$400 thousand in the previous year, according to a report).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-am-moro-mptcu", "evid:f05-cnmp-palestras-2017" ] }, "falas": [], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f05-atuacao" }, { "id": "ep:politica-dallagnol-e-moro-processos-eleitorais", "titulo": "Entry into politics: Dallagnol removed by the Superior Electoral Court (TSE) in 2023, the 2026 candidacy, and Moro's outcome at the Superior Electoral Court (TSE)", "nucleo": "atuacao", "pessoas": [ "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "pessoa:sergio-moro", "pessoa:benedito-goncalves", "pessoa:floriano-azevedo-marques", "pessoa:nunes-marques", "pessoa:dias-toffoli" ], "resumo": "Dallagnol left the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) in November 2021, joined Podemos, and was elected federal deputy in 2022; on May 16, 2023 the Superior Electoral Court (TSE), unanimously, revoked his candidacy registration, finding that his resignation had been a fraud on the Clean Record Law (Ficha Limpa) because disciplinary proceedings were pending; the Chamber of Deputies confirmed the loss of his seat on June 6, 2023. It is an electoral decision. In 2023 he joined Novo and in 2026 ran for the Senate in Paraná, receiving 2,904,594 votes; Justice Floriano de Azevedo Marques rejected the registration (October 3, 2026), Kassio Nunes Marques reversed it (October 4, 2026), and, according to the latest news located (October 8, 2026), the full court had not yet decided. Moro: on May 21, 2024 the Superior Electoral Court (TSE), unanimously, rejected the appeals seeking revocation of his Senate mandate, upholding the decision of the Paraná Regional Electoral Court (TRE-PR).", "acusacao": [ { "autor": "org:pmn", "texto": "The PMN and the Brasil da Esperança federation argued before the Superior Electoral Court (TSE), in 2023, that Dallagnol was ineligible for having resigned from the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) with disciplinary proceedings pending (Complementary Law 64/90, art. 1, I, g and q); in 2026 the state PT again challenged his eligibility.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-politica-tse-2023-cassacao", "evid:f05-politica-2026-votos-adiamento" ] }, { "autor": "org:pl", "texto": "The PL and the Brasil da Esperança Federation accused Moro of abuse of economic power and other irregularities in the 2022 pre-campaign, seeking revocation of his mandate and eight years of ineligibility.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-politica-moro-tse-acoes" ] } ], "evidencias": [ "evid:f05-politica-saida-mpf", "evid:f05-politica-tse-2023-cassacao", "evid:f05-politica-tse-2023-controversia", "evid:f05-politica-dallagnol-vinganca", "evid:f05-politica-toffoli-2023", "evid:f05-politica-novo-2023", "evid:f05-politica-2026-tse-liminar", "evid:f05-politica-2026-floriano-indefere", "evid:f05-politica-2026-nunes-marques", "evid:f05-politica-2026-votos-adiamento", "evid:f05-politica-moro-tse-2024", "evid:f05-politica-moro-tse-acoes" ], "respostas": [ { "autor": "pessoa:deltan-dallagnol", "texto": "Dallagnol called the decision an 'unprecedented act of revenge' and, in October 2023, said that the decision denied his registration but did not make him ineligible and that he expected a new attempt to revoke his mandate.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-politica-dallagnol-vinganca", "evid:f05-politica-novo-2023" ], "fala": "fala:dallagnol-twitter-2023-vinganca" }, { "autor": "pessoa:sergio-moro", "texto": "Moro called the Superior Electoral Court (TSE) judgment technical and independent (headline of a Poder360 report); the defense argued there was no undeclared campaign money (caixa 2), abuse, or irregularities.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-politica-moro-tse-2024" ] } ], "decisoes": [ { "data": "2023-05-16", "orgao": "org:tse", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "RO 0601407-70 (número informado em resultado de busca; documento não aberto)", "tipo": "eleitoral", "resultado": "Unanimously, Dallagnol's candidacy registration revoked; resignation from the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) considered a fraud on the Clean Record Law (Ficha Limpa); rapporteur Benedito Gonçalves.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-politica-tse-2023-cassacao", "evid:f05-politica-tse-2023-controversia" ] }, { "data": "2023-06-07", "orgao": "org:stf", "instancia": "Justice Dias Toffoli", "processo": "Pedido de Dallagnol (classe não informada)", "tipo": "eleitoral", "resultado": "Request to suspend the Superior Electoral Court (TSE) decision denied; no ruling on the merits located.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-politica-toffoli-2023" ] }, { "data": "2024-05-21", "orgao": "org:tse", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "Recursos 0604176-51.2022.6.16.0000 (PL) e 0604298-64.2022.6.16.0000 (Federação Brasil da Esperança)", "tipo": "eleitoral", "resultado": "Unanimously, appeals rejected; dismissal of the actions against Moro and his Senate mandate upheld.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-politica-moro-tse-2024" ] }, { "data": "2026-09-21", "orgao": "org:tse", "instancia": "Full court (Plenary)", "processo": "Registro de candidatura de Dallagnol (Senado, PR; número não informado)", "tipo": "eleitoral", "resultado": "By 5 votes to 2 (Mendonça and Nunes Marques outvoted), the preliminary injunction that suspended the campaign upheld.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-politica-2026-tse-liminar" ] }, { "data": "2026-10-03", "orgao": "org:tse", "instancia": "Justice Floriano de Azevedo Marques (single-justice decision)", "processo": "Registro de candidatura de Dallagnol (Senado, PR)", "tipo": "eleitoral", "resultado": "Registration rejected: the eight-year ineligibility would cover 2026 (the source does not state the period).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-politica-2026-floriano-indefere" ] }, { "data": "2026-10-04", "orgao": "org:tse", "instancia": "Chief Justice Kassio Nunes Marques (single-justice decision)", "processo": "Registro de candidatura de Dallagnol (Senado, PR)", "tipo": "eleitoral", "resultado": "Decision reversed before the vote: candidacy 'granted pending appeal,' votes processed and validity subject to the full court.", "evid": [ "evid:f05-politica-2026-nunes-marques" ] } ], "desfecho": { "data_ref": "2026-10-08", "texto": "Dallagnol: the revocation of the 2023 registration was upheld (Toffoli denied suspension); in the latest news located (October 8, 2026) the 2026 situation was open — registration 'granted pending appeal,' 2,904,594 votes counted, and the Superior Electoral Court (TSE) full-court judgment postponed on October 8, 2026 with no new date; nothing after October 8, 2026 was checked. Moro: actions to revoke his mandate dismissed as unfounded (Paraná Regional Electoral Court (TRE-PR), April 9, 2024) and appeals rejected (TSE, May 21, 2024, unanimously); mandate upheld; no later appeal located. The entry on Moro's political trajectory (party affiliations, alliances, candidacies) is in another entry in the archive. Note: Dallagnol left the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) in November 2021, and there is a one-day discrepancy among the sources (11/02 and November 3, 2021).", "evid": [ "evid:f05-politica-2026-votos-adiamento", "evid:f05-politica-moro-tse-2024" ] }, "falas": [ "fala:dallagnol-twitter-2023-vozes-caladas", "fala:dallagnol-twitter-2023-vinganca", "fala:dallagnol-itatiaia-2023-nao-inelegivel", "fala:dallagnol-itatiaia-2023-candidatura-possivel", "fala:floriano-tse-2026-comportamento-fraudulento" ], "estado": "revisado_humano", "lote": "f05-atuacao" } ]