Skip to content
LAVAJATO.ORGrecovered × cost

Cases

Action 5033048-90.2022.4.04.7000 (JF/PR) — annulment of the TCU ruling

Body
Federal Courts of Paraná
Number
5033048-90.2022.4.04.7000
Subject
Annulment of a TCU decision as to Dallagnol (the article does not identify the ruling); first-instance action at the 6th Federal Court of Paraná, with the appeal judged by the TRF-4.
Status as of October 24, 2026: Annulment upheld by the TRF-4, according to an article of September 26, 2024 (session date and vote count not given); we did not find any later appeal.
Sources (1)

In an article of September 26, 2024 (session date not provided), the TRF-4 Twelfth Panel denied the Union's appeal and upheld the first-instance judgment (case 5033048-90.2022.4.04.7000) that had annulled the decision of the TCU Second Chamber, for lack of legal basis for Dallagnol's summons; the report says responsibility for the per diem model lay with other officials.

Judicial or administrative decisionSingle source

Parties and roles

Case history

  1. Judgment annuls the ruling.

    Sources (1)

    On December 5, 2022, Judge Augusto César Pansini Gonçalves of the 6th Federal Court of Curitiba annulled the TCU decision as to Dallagnol and the acts resulting from it (the article speaks of an 'April decision' of the TCU, without identifying the ruling), finding that Dallagnol, not having been an authorizing officer for expenditures, could not be the target of the accounts proceeding, and criticizing the rapporteur for appearing to prejudge the case; according to the report, in September 2022 the TCU had upheld the fine and the reimbursement against Dallagnol and cleared Romão.

    Judicial or administrative decisionSingle source
  2. 12th Panel of the TRF-4 upholds it, on the Union's appeal (reported on September 26, 2024; session date and vote count not given).

    Sources (1)

    In an article of September 26, 2024 (session date not provided), the TRF-4 Twelfth Panel denied the Union's appeal and upheld the first-instance judgment (case 5033048-90.2022.4.04.7000) that had annulled the decision of the TCU Second Chamber, for lack of legal basis for Dallagnol's summons; the report says responsibility for the per diem model lay with other officials.

    Judicial or administrative decisionSingle source