Action 5033048-90.2022.4.04.7000 (JF/PR) — annulment of the TCU ruling
- Body
- Federal Courts of Paraná
- Number
- 5033048-90.2022.4.04.7000
- Subject
- Annulment of a TCU decision as to Dallagnol (the article does not identify the ruling); first-instance action at the 6th Federal Court of Paraná, with the appeal judged by the TRF-4.
Sources (1)
In an article of September 26, 2024 (session date not provided), the TRF-4 Twelfth Panel denied the Union's appeal and upheld the first-instance judgment (case 5033048-90.2022.4.04.7000) that had annulled the decision of the TCU Second Chamber, for lack of legal basis for Dallagnol's summons; the report says responsibility for the per diem model lay with other officials.
Source: TRF-4 anula decisão do TCU contra Dallagnol por despesas da Lava Jato — Migalhas, Sept. 26, 2024 · body of the article · open original ↗
Parties and roles
- Deltan Dallagnol — plaintiff
- Bruno Dantas — rapporteur at the TCU, criticized in the judgment
Case history
Judgment annuls the ruling.
Sources (1)
On December 5, 2022, Judge Augusto César Pansini Gonçalves of the 6th Federal Court of Curitiba annulled the TCU decision as to Dallagnol and the acts resulting from it (the article speaks of an 'April decision' of the TCU, without identifying the ruling), finding that Dallagnol, not having been an authorizing officer for expenditures, could not be the target of the accounts proceeding, and criticizing the rapporteur for appearing to prejudge the case; according to the report, in September 2022 the TCU had upheld the fine and the reimbursement against Dallagnol and cleared Romão.
Judicial or administrative decisionSingle sourceSource: Justiça anula condenação de Dallagnol por diárias da Lava Jato — Poder360, Dec. 6, 2022 · body of the article · open original ↗
12th Panel of the TRF-4 upholds it, on the Union's appeal (reported on September 26, 2024; session date and vote count not given).
Sources (1)
In an article of September 26, 2024 (session date not provided), the TRF-4 Twelfth Panel denied the Union's appeal and upheld the first-instance judgment (case 5033048-90.2022.4.04.7000) that had annulled the decision of the TCU Second Chamber, for lack of legal basis for Dallagnol's summons; the report says responsibility for the per diem model lay with other officials.
Judicial or administrative decisionSingle sourceSource: TRF-4 anula decisão do TCU contra Dallagnol por despesas da Lava Jato — Migalhas, Sept. 26, 2024 · body of the article · open original ↗

