Skip to content
LAVAJATO.ORGrecovered × cost

Episode profiles

Flávio Bolsonaro, Queiroz, and the Rio Federal Police: what Moro alleged and what he did not

Sergio Moro · Jair Bolsonaro · Flávio Bolsonaro · Fabrício Queiroz · Paulo Marinho

In the address of April 24, 2020 and in the testimony of May 2, 2020, Moro did not mention Flávio Bolsonaro or the 'rachadinha'; in the testimony he said he knew of no connection between the replacements requested and operations against the president's circle. In June 2020, a filing by Moro's defense pointed to a coincidence of dates between the first wish to replace the Rio PF (August 2019) and the Queiroz defense's request for access to a confidential Rio de Janeiro Federal Police inquiry, and cited Paulo Marinho's account. In an interview with Flow Podcast (date not located), Moro reportedly said Bolsonaro reacted with irritation to Toffoli's decision on Coaf, which benefited Flávio. The 'rachadinha' investigation in Flávio's office at the Rio legislature (Alerj) is by the Rio de Janeiro Public Prosecutor's Office (state-level); in the sources read, there is no document linking Inq 4831 to that investigation.

Status as of October 24, 2026: No court decision on the hypothesis linking the Rio Federal Police (PF) to the investigation of Flávio. The Office of the Prosecutor General (PGR) and the Supreme Federal Court (STF) indicated in 2025 that they want to verify 'interference in investigations involving himself, his relatives, and allies,' without naming a specific case (STF, October 16, 2025). Inquiry into the alleged Furna da Onça leak: outcome not read. According to Revista Fórum (October 21, 2026), Flávio was indicted in 2020 and the rachadinha case was closed after the annulment of evidence, without a ruling on the merits (not checked in a judicial source). Inq 4831 open according to the latest news located (April 12, 2026).
Sources (1)

On October 16, 2025 the STF reported that Moraes granted a PGR request and reopened the investigations in Inq 4831; the PGR, which in September 2022 had asked for closure, said on October 15, 2025 that the case file indicates the need for complementary measures.

Judicial or administrative decisionProven in a document
Accusation
Sergio Moro: Moro's defense argued, in a filing, that the wish to replace the Rio superintendency coincided with the Queiroz defense's request for access to a confidential Rio de Janeiro Federal Police inquiry, which would indirectly mention Flávio.
Sources (1)

Moro's defense stated, in a petition attached to the inquiry by Federal Police chief investigator Christiane Correa Machado, that Bolsonaro's first wish to replace the Rio superintendent occurred in August 2019, the same month in which Fabrício Queiroz's defense requested access to a confidential PF inquiry in Rio that would mention Queiroz and, indirectly, Flávio Bolsonaro.

AccusationAllegation
Paulo Marinho: Marinho, Flávio's alternate senator, told Folha that a Federal Police (PF) chief investigator warned Flávio of an operation that would hit Queiroz.
Sources (1)

Businessman Paulo Marinho, Flávio's alternate in the Senate, told Folha that Flávio was warned by a PF chief investigator that an operation would hit Fabrício Queiroz; the PF opened an inquiry into the alleged leak in 2020. Moro's defense cited this account in its petition.

AccusationDisputed
Sergio Moro: According to Revista Fórum (October 21, 2026), in an interview with Flow Podcast (date not located; video not seen), Moro reportedly said that Bolsonaro began weakening anticorruption mechanisms out of fear of investigations into relatives. Sole source; the article carries no response from Bolsonaro or Flávio.
Sources (1)

According to Revista Fórum (October 21, 2026), in an interview with Flow Podcast (date not given) Moro said that Bolsonaro reacted with irritation to Dias Toffoli's decision (July 2019, at the request of Flávio's defense) on Coaf data (Moro's account reproduced by Fórum, without quotation marks here) and that he associated the move of Coaf to another ministry with Bolsonaro's concern about investigations of family members.

AccusationSingle source
Response
Jair Bolsonaro: Said on April 24, 2020 that he had never asked for a relative to be shielded. — verbatim quote
Sources (1)

On the same day, in an address of about 46 minutes, Bolsonaro denied having interfered in the PF, stated that it is his prerogative to dismiss the director-general, said Valeixo agreed to leave at his own request, and that Moro had conditioned the change on a nomination to the STF.

StatementAllegation
Flávio Bolsonaro: Categorically denied Marinho's account. — verbatim quote
Sources (1)

In a statement, Flávio Bolsonaro's defense categorically denied Paulo Marinho's account and called it an attempt to manipulate the courts in his own interest; Flávio's chief of staff denied, in testimony of June 10, 2020, having received information about Operation Furna da Onça.

Response/defenseSingle source

Quotes

as afirmações de Paulo Marinho têm objetivo simples: manipular a Justiça em interesse próprio. […] E o senador nega, categoricamente, o que foi dito por Marinho

Portal translation: Paulo Marinho's statements have a simple purpose: to manipulate the courts in his own interest. […] And the senator categorically denies what was said by Marinho

Flávio Bolsonaro · May 2020 · Note/letter · Note from Flávio Bolsonaro's defense, quoted by Poder360 on August 4, 2020

Context, original and sources →
Nunca pedi para blindar ninguém da minha família. Jamais faria isso.

Portal translation: I never asked to shield anyone in my family. I would never do that.

Jair Bolsonaro · April 24, 2020 · Address · Address at the Planalto Palace, transcribed by Poder360

Context, original and sources →

Evidence

In his testimony to the PF on May 2, 2020, according to the report, Moro was asked whether he saw a connection between the changes requested by Bolsonaro and operations against people close to the president and answered that he was unaware of any connection and had no access to ongoing investigations.

Document described in a news reportSingle source

News report · full text examined · accessed on Oct. 24, 2026

Limitations: Original record not examined. In the reading of the April 24, 2020 address, Moro does not mention Flávio Bolsonaro or the 'rachadinha' (text search in the full text of the transcript).

Moro's defense stated, in a petition attached to the inquiry by Federal Police chief investigator Christiane Correa Machado, that Bolsonaro's first wish to replace the Rio superintendent occurred in August 2019, the same month in which Fabrício Queiroz's defense requested access to a confidential PF inquiry in Rio that would mention Queiroz and, indirectly, Flávio Bolsonaro.

AccusationAllegation

News report · full text examined · accessed on Oct. 24, 2026

Limitations: It is Moro's defense that establishes the coincidence of dates; the document was not examined and the report does not identify which confidential PF inquiry in Rio it was. The 'rachadinha' investigation in Flávio's office at Alerj is conducted by the Rio Public Prosecutor's Office, and the report does not show that it is the same proceeding. Bolsonaro, in 2021 testimony, gave another reason (fonte).

Businessman Paulo Marinho, Flávio's alternate in the Senate, told Folha that Flávio was warned by a PF chief investigator that an operation would hit Fabrício Queiroz; the PF opened an inquiry into the alleged leak in 2020. Moro's defense cited this account in its petition.

AccusationDisputed

News report · full text examined · accessed on Oct. 24, 2026

Limitations: Marinho's allegation, denied by Flávio. The outcome of the inquiry into the alleged leak was not read. Marinho is not a party to Moro's accusation.

In a statement, Flávio Bolsonaro's defense categorically denied Paulo Marinho's account and called it an attempt to manipulate the courts in his own interest; Flávio's chief of staff denied, in testimony of June 10, 2020, having received information about Operation Furna da Onça.

Response/defenseSingle source

Excerpt: “o senador nega, categoricamente, o que foi dito por Marinho”

News report · full text examined · accessed on Oct. 24, 2026

According to Revista Fórum (October 21, 2026), in an interview with Flow Podcast (date not given) Moro said that Bolsonaro reacted with irritation to Dias Toffoli's decision (July 2019, at the request of Flávio's defense) on Coaf data (Moro's account reproduced by Fórum, without quotation marks here) and that he associated the move of Coaf to another ministry with Bolsonaro's concern about investigations of family members.

AccusationSingle source

News report · full text examined · accessed on Oct. 24, 2026

Limitations: The quotation is the outlet's indirect account ('reportedly said'). The original video and the date of the interview were not located. No literal statement was included. The article carries no response from Jair or Flávio Bolsonaro to this account; we did not locate one.

According to Revista Fórum (April 7, 2026), at the press conference of April 6, 2026 in Curitiba Moro did not directly answer whether he saw a risk of Flávio Bolsonaro controlling the PF; Revista Fórum links the question to the accusation Moro made against Jair Bolsonaro in 2020 (Moro's accusation was about obtaining information and intelligence reports and changing the PF leadership; 'controlling the PF' is the outlet's framing).

News reportSingle source

News report · full text examined · accessed on Oct. 24, 2026

Limitations: The video was not seen, and the transcript of Moro's answer is not in the text read. The outlet does not hear from Moro or the PL on the assessment of the episode. Outlet with a critical editorial line; single source.

Identifier: ep:flavio-bolsonaro-queiroz-pf-rio