In the address of April 24, 2020 and in the testimony of May 2, 2020, Moro did not mention Flávio Bolsonaro or the 'rachadinha'; in the testimony he said he knew of no connection between the replacements requested and operations against the president's circle. In June 2020, a filing by Moro's defense pointed to a coincidence of dates between the first wish to replace the Rio PF (August 2019) and the Queiroz defense's request for access to a confidential Rio de Janeiro Federal Police inquiry, and cited Paulo Marinho's account. In an interview with Flow Podcast (date not located), Moro reportedly said Bolsonaro reacted with irritation to Toffoli's decision on Coaf, which benefited Flávio. The 'rachadinha' investigation in Flávio's office at the Rio legislature (Alerj) is by the Rio de Janeiro Public Prosecutor's Office (state-level); in the sources read, there is no document linking Inq 4831 to that investigation.
Evidence
In his testimony to the PF on May 2, 2020, according to the report, Moro was asked whether he saw a connection between the changes requested by Bolsonaro and operations against people close to the president and answered that he was unaware of any connection and had no access to ongoing investigations.
Document described in a news reportSingle source
Source: 'Você tem 27 superintendências, eu quero apenas uma, a do RJ': confira depoimento de Moro à PF — Tribuna de Jundiaí, May 5, 2020 · section 'The president's circle' · open original ↗
News report · full text examined · accessed on Oct. 24, 2026
Limitations: Original record not examined. In the reading of the April 24, 2020 address, Moro does not mention Flávio Bolsonaro or the 'rachadinha' (text search in the full text of the transcript).
Moro's defense stated, in a petition attached to the inquiry by Federal Police chief investigator Christiane Correa Machado, that Bolsonaro's first wish to replace the Rio superintendent occurred in August 2019, the same month in which Fabrício Queiroz's defense requested access to a confidential PF inquiry in Rio that would mention Queiroz and, indirectly, Flávio Bolsonaro.
AccusationAllegation
Source: Moro relaciona troca na PF do RJ a pedido de Queiroz para acesso à investigação — Congresso em Foco, June 23, 2020 · paragraphs 1 to 4 and 10 · open original ↗
News report · full text examined · accessed on Oct. 24, 2026
Limitations: It is Moro's defense that establishes the coincidence of dates; the document was not examined and the report does not identify which confidential PF inquiry in Rio it was. The 'rachadinha' investigation in Flávio's office at Alerj is conducted by the Rio Public Prosecutor's Office, and the report does not show that it is the same proceeding. Bolsonaro, in 2021 testimony, gave another reason (fonte).
Businessman Paulo Marinho, Flávio's alternate in the Senate, told Folha that Flávio was warned by a PF chief investigator that an operation would hit Fabrício Queiroz; the PF opened an inquiry into the alleged leak in 2020. Moro's defense cited this account in its petition.
AccusationDisputed
Source: Chefe de gabinete de Flávio Bolsonaro nega vazamento de operação — Poder360, Aug. 4, 2020 · paragraphs 2, 5, and 6 · open original ↗
News report · full text examined · accessed on Oct. 24, 2026
Limitations: Marinho's allegation, denied by Flávio. The outcome of the inquiry into the alleged leak was not read. Marinho is not a party to Moro's accusation.
In a statement, Flávio Bolsonaro's defense categorically denied Paulo Marinho's account and called it an attempt to manipulate the courts in his own interest; Flávio's chief of staff denied, in testimony of June 10, 2020, having received information about Operation Furna da Onça.
Response/defenseSingle source
Excerpt: “o senador nega, categoricamente, o que foi dito por Marinho”
Source: Chefe de gabinete de Flávio Bolsonaro nega vazamento de operação — Poder360, Aug. 4, 2020 · paragraphs 1 and 6 · open original ↗
News report · full text examined · accessed on Oct. 24, 2026
According to Revista Fórum (October 21, 2026), in an interview with Flow Podcast (date not given) Moro said that Bolsonaro reacted with irritation to Dias Toffoli's decision (July 2019, at the request of Flávio's defense) on Coaf data (Moro's account reproduced by Fórum, without quotation marks here) and that he associated the move of Coaf to another ministry with Bolsonaro's concern about investigations of family members.
AccusationSingle source
Source: Moro acusou Bolsonaro de tentar barrar investigação contra Flávio? Entenda o caso — Revista Fórum, Oct. 21, 2026 · paragraphs 1 to 7 · open original ↗
News report · full text examined · accessed on Oct. 24, 2026
Limitations: The quotation is the outlet's indirect account ('reportedly said'). The original video and the date of the interview were not located. No literal statement was included. The article carries no response from Jair or Flávio Bolsonaro to this account; we did not locate one.
According to Revista Fórum (April 7, 2026), at the press conference of April 6, 2026 in Curitiba Moro did not directly answer whether he saw a risk of Flávio Bolsonaro controlling the PF; Revista Fórum links the question to the accusation Moro made against Jair Bolsonaro in 2020 (Moro's accusation was about obtaining information and intelligence reports and changing the PF leadership; 'controlling the PF' is the outlet's framing).
News reportSingle source
Source: Moro se irrita, se enrola e foge de pergunta sobre Flávio Bolsonaro e controle da PF; veja vídeo — Revista Fórum, Apr. 7, 2026 · paragraphs 3 to 6 · open original ↗
News report · full text examined · accessed on Oct. 24, 2026
Limitations: The video was not seen, and the transcript of Moro's answer is not in the text read. The outlet does not hear from Moro or the PL on the assessment of the episode. Outlet with a critical editorial line; single source.