Statement library · Vote

Gilmar Mendes, March 9, 2021

“O exame conglobante de tudo o que foi até aqui narrado estreita a inevitável compreensão de que houve de fato a violação do dever de imparcialidade do magistrado.”

Portal translation: The comprehensive examination of everything narrated so far leads to the inevitable understanding that there was indeed a violation of the magistrate's duty of impartiality.

The translation is the portal's; the original text, in Portuguese, is the one that prevails.

Context: Conclusion of Gilmar Mendes's vote for the bias ruling on Moro in the triplex case.
Where: Vote · Vote in HC 164.493/DF (Second Panel of the Supreme Federal Court (STF))
Verification: Checked against a case document: Voto do ministro Gilmar Mendes no HC 164.493/DF (suspeição de Sergio Moro), on Oct. 24, 2026. Copied from the PDF of the vote (section 6). Date of March 9, 2021 inferred from the vote itself, which refers to March 8, 2021 as "yesterday"; the conclusion was read in session on March 23, 2021.
Topics: bias ruling, stf
Mentions: Sergio Moro, Lula

Comparisons

Moro: "no abnormality is perceived" (June 9, 2019) × Supreme Federal Court (STF) rulings on his bias (2021)

Related events

Mar. 23, 2021 — STF Second Panel declares Moro biased

Sources

Voto do ministro Gilmar Mendes no HC 164.493/DF (suspeição de Sergio Moro) — Supreme Federal Court (copy published by Poder360), Mar. 2021 · original ↗

Related statements

Sobre supostas mensagens que me envolveriam publicadas pelo site Intercept neste domingo, 9 de junho, lamenta-se a falta de indicação de fonte de pessoa responsável pela invasão criminosa de celulares de procuradores. Assim como a postura do site que não entrou em […]

Portal translation: Regarding supposed messages involving me published by the site Intercept this Sunday, June 9, we regret the lack of identification of the source, the person responsible for the criminal invasion of prosecutors' cell phones. We also regret the stance of the site, which […]

Sergio Moro · June 9, 2019 · Note/letter · Statement from the Minister of Justice (Migalhas)

Context, original and sources →

O Tribunal de Curitiba é conhecido mundialmente como um tribunal de exceção. Enche-nos de vergonha

Portal translation: The Curitiba Court is known worldwide as a court of exception. It fills us with shame

Gilmar Mendes · March 23, 2021 · Vote · Second Panel of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) (HC 164.493)

Context, original and sources →

reitero que a conclusão sobre a parcialidade do julgador é aferível a partir dos fatos narrados na impetração original, de modo a se afastar quaisquer eventuais discussões sobre o tema da possibilidade de utilização da prova potencialmente ilícita pela defesa.

Portal translation: I reiterate that the conclusion about the judge's partiality can be ascertained from the facts narrated in the original petition, so as to rule out any possible discussions on the possibility of the defense using potentially illicit evidence.

Gilmar Mendes · March 9, 2021 · Vote · Vote in HC 164.493/DF (Second Panel of the Supreme Federal Court (STF))

Context, original and sources →

Depois, fui eu quem, diante da clara ilegalidade e desvio de finalidade, suspendeu a posse de Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva como Ministro indicado por Dilma Rousseff em meio à deflagração de fase da Operação Lava Jato (MS 34.070 MC, DJe 28.3.2016), afirmando que tal ato […]

Portal translation: Later, it was I who, given the clear illegality and misuse of purpose, suspended the swearing-in of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva as Minister appointed by Dilma Rousseff amid the launch of a phase of Operation Lava Jato (MS 34.070 MC, DJe 3/28/2016), stating that this act […]

Gilmar Mendes · March 9, 2021 · Vote · Vote in HC 164.493/DF (Second Panel of the Supreme Federal Court (STF))

Context, original and sources →

All statements by Gilmar Mendes · Identifier: fala:gilmar-voto-2021-03-09-conclusao